Skip to content

Conversation

@luoliwoshang
Copy link
Member

No description provided.

Copilot AI review requested due to automatic review settings July 21, 2025 01:28
Copy link
Contributor

Copilot AI left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Pull Request Overview

This PR updates the SQLite3 Go bindings to version 1.0.2, focusing on converting method-style function bindings to package-level functions and expanding struct definitions for virtual table indexing.

  • Converts receiver-based method calls to package-level functions using go:linkname directives
  • Replaces placeholder struct fields with proper field definitions for indexing structures
  • Updates public API exports to include newly defined index-related types

Reviewed Changes

Copilot reviewed 2 out of 2 changed files in this pull request and generated 3 comments.

File Description
sqlite3/sqlite3.go Converts method bindings to package functions and defines proper struct fields for IndexConstraint, IndexOrderby, and IndexConstraintUsage
sqlite3/llcppg.pub Exports newly defined index-related struct types in the public API
Comments suppressed due to low confidence (3)

sqlite3/sqlite3.go:1088

  • Parameter name '__llgo_arg_0' is not descriptive. Consider using 'db' or 'sqlite' to match the receiver pattern from the original method.
func DbConfig(__llgo_arg_0 *Sqlite3, op c.Int, __llgo_va_list ...interface{}) c.Int

sqlite3/sqlite3.go:6458

  • Parameter name '__llgo_arg_0' is not descriptive. Consider using 'str' or 's' to match the receiver pattern from the original method.
func StrAppendf(__llgo_arg_0 *Str, zFormat *c.Char, __llgo_va_list ...interface{})

sqlite3/sqlite3.go:7292

  • Parameter name '__llgo_arg_0' is not descriptive. Consider using 'db' or 'sqlite' to match the receiver pattern from the original method.
func VtabConfig(__llgo_arg_0 *Sqlite3, op c.Int, __llgo_va_list ...interface{}) c.Int

@MeteorsLiu MeteorsLiu merged commit a57ee8f into main Jul 21, 2025
4 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants