-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.2k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
liboqs: Initial integration #12408
liboqs: Initial integration #12408
Conversation
TODO:
|
silvergasp is integrating a new project: |
5742927
to
6363ee4
Compare
Is this ready for review? Thanks : ) |
A yes/no on if oss-fuzz is interested in merging would be great. But no Im still waiting on open-quantum-safe/liboqs#1905 to be merged. This draft PR is still downloading my fork which contains the new fuzz harnesses. |
6363ee4
to
248111b
Compare
248111b
to
0f3fc87
Compare
@DonggeLiu this is now ready for review. Why is liboqs critical for global infrastructure?
With increasing interest in general purpose quantum computing it is critical that quantum resistant encryption algorithms are stabilised and verified before the so-called "Q-day" when current encryption algorithms are vulnerable to quantum attacks. This fuzzing effort will accelerate the time-frame under which liboqs will be ready for general use. |
Thanks @nathaniel-brough for initiating these first steps resolving a long-standing issue to improve the code base! Once deployed to at least the algorithms now standardized (ML-KEM, ML-DSA, SLH-DSA) and partially already included in the library, this will help improve the reliability of the code base. If explicitly needed, @DonggeLiu this is to state support and gratitude for this effort as a maintainer of liboqs. |
Thanks @nathaniel-brough and @baentsch. I will merge the PR. |
Thanks for doing this!! |
No description provided.