Correction du flacky test sur les périmètres géographiques - Deuxième round #876
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
raphodn
approved these changes
Aug 23, 2023
SebastienReuiller
deleted the
sreuiller/fix-geo-perimeter-flacky-test-round2
branch
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Suite de #869
Quoi ?
Des tests sur le périmètre Guadeloupe sautent encore.
Pourquoi ?
Parce que les
FactorySiaeoù le département et le code postal ne sont pas définis peuvent se retrouver dans un périmètre testé (par exemple si le code postal généré est 38000 ou le département est 29).Comment ?
En définissant des valeurs géographiques cohérentes entre elles.