-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 73
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Add workflow: genome annotation with Maker #631
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Conversation
This looks really cool already, thanks! When I'm importing the WF on Galaxy Europe, it complains about So I guess that needs to be fixed. In the README I would not discuss inputs/outputs per tool but at the WF level to avoid redundancy. Without knowing too much about the details of the WF, would a MultiQC combined report of some of the results make sense? |
filetype: snaphmm | ||
|
||
|
||
outputs: |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Most of these outputs should be exactly reproducible text files. It's better to check them for actual content than just for approx. size.
You can test the presence of specific lines of text, for example.
Test Results (powered by Planemo)Test Summary
Failed Tests
|
Test Results (powered by Planemo)Test Summary
Failed Tests
|
Test Results (powered by Planemo)Test Summary
Failed Tests
|
Test Results (powered by Planemo)Test Summary
Failed Tests
|
Hello,
I would like to propose this workflow for annotating a genome from the GTN "Genome annotation with Maker (short)".
Thank you! Have a nice day!