feat: improve formatting Jinja blocks in attributes

[g-plane]

Please note that interpolations in attribute name and attribute value won't be formatted. This is expected since they're parsed as plain texts.

cc @UnknownPlatypus

[UnknownPlatypus]

Please note that interpolations in attribute name and attribute value won't be formatted. This is expected since they're parsed as plain texts.

I think it's better like that for now. Parsing and formatting interpolation in attribute value will add complexity and is not always safe if whitespace are important (in href values for example)

[UnknownPlatypus]

Will this always break even if the print width is not exceeded ? Maybe i'm not counting right but the line was initially of width 60 so I'm not sure it should have wrapped ?

[g-plane]

Initially I tried it but I found that will be ugly.

[UnknownPlatypus]

This is great 🥳

[UnknownPlatypus]

@g-plane This seems to cause an issue for the following snippet that is not parsing anymore:

<picture
    {% for key, val in attributes.items %} 
        {{ key }}="{{ val }}"
    {% endfor %}
></picture>

I get this Failed to parse "src/t.html" with error Syntax(SyntaxError { kind: ExpectJinjaTag, pos: 61, line: 3, column: 11 }). This is failing to parse {{ key }} because it expect a JinjaTag.