Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update observables_bs.py #258

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from
Open
Changes from 1 commit
Commits
File filter

Filter by extension

Filter by extension

Conversations
Failed to load comments.
Loading
Jump to
Jump to file
Failed to load files.
Loading
Diff view
Diff view
95 changes: 93 additions & 2 deletions flavio/physics/bdecays/bvll/observables_bs.py
Original file line number Diff line number Diff line change
Expand Up @@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
see arXiv:1502.05509."""

import flavio
from . import observables
import observables
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Is there a particular reason why this has been changed? I think here the relative import should be kept.

Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

If you look at the output of the unit tests, you will see that this change actually leads to ModuleNotFoundError: No module named 'observables'

from flavio.classes import Observable, Prediction
import cmath
import warnings
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -33,6 +33,31 @@ def bsvll_obs(function, q2, wc_obj, par, B, V, lep):
J_h = flavio.physics.bdecays.angular.angularcoeffs_h_v(phi, h, h_tilde, q2, mB, mV, mb, 0, ml, ml)
return function(y, J, J_bar, J_h)


def A_experiment_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i):
return A_experiment_num(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i)/SA_den_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h)

# numerator
def A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i):
if i in [4, '6s', '6c', 7, 9]:
return -A_theory_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i)
return A_theory_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i)


def A_theory_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i):
r"""Angular CP asymmetry $A_i$ in the theory convention."""
return A_theory_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i)/SA_den_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i)

# numerator
def A_theory_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i):
return 1/(1-y**2) * (J[i] - J_bar[i]) - y/(1-y**2) * J_h[i]

# denominator of P_i observables
def P_den_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h):
return S_theory_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h,'2s')



def S_theory_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, i):
# (42) of 1502.05509
flavio.citations.register("Descotes-Genon:2015hea")
Expand Down Expand Up @@ -135,18 +160,65 @@ def fct(wc_obj, par):
return fct

# Observable and Prediction instances

# https://arxiv.org/pdf/2210.11995
_tex = {'e': 'e', 'mu': '\mu', 'tau': r'\tau'}
_observables = {
'FL': {'func_num': FL_num_Bs, 'tex': r'\overline{F_L}', 'desc': 'Time-averaged longitudinal polarization fraction'},
'S3': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: S_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 3), 'tex': r'\overline{S_3}', 'desc': 'Time-averaged, CP-averaged angular observable'},
'S4': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: S_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 4), 'tex': r'\overline{S_4}', 'desc': 'Time-averaged, CP-averaged angular observable'},
'S5': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: S_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 5), 'tex': r'\overline{S_5}', 'desc': 'Time-averaged, CP-averaged angular observable'},
'S5': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: S_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 5), 'tex': r'\overline{S_5}', 'desc': 'Time-averaged, CP-averaged angular observable'},
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

The two lines above are exactly the same, but S6c is missing.

'S7': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: S_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 7), 'tex': r'\overline{S_7}', 'desc': 'Time-averaged, CP-averaged angular observable'},
'S8': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: S_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 8), 'tex': r'\overline{S_8}', 'desc': 'Time-averaged, CP-averaged angular observable'},
'S9': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: S_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 9), 'tex': r'\overline{S_9}', 'desc': 'Time-averaged, CP-averaged angular observable'},
'A3': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 3), 'tex': r'\overline{A_3}', 'desc': 'Angular CP asymmetry'},
'A4': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 4), 'tex': r'\overline{A_4}', 'desc': 'Angular CP asymmetry'},
'A5': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 5), 'tex': r'\overline{A_5}', 'desc': 'Angular CP asymmetry'},
'A6s': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, '6s'), 'tex': r'\overline{A_6^s}', 'desc': 'Angular CP asymmetry'},
'A7': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 7), 'tex': r'\overline{A_7}', 'desc': 'Angular CP asymmetry'},
'A8': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 8), 'tex': r'\overline{A_8}', 'desc': 'Angular CP asymmetry'},
'A9': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 9), 'tex': r'\overline{A_9}', 'desc': 'Angular CP asymmetry'},

}
_observables_p = {
'P1': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: S_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 3)/2., 'tex': r'P_1', 'desc': "CP-averaged \"optimized\" angular observable"},
'ATIm': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 9)/2., 'tex': r'A_T^\text{Im}', 'desc': "Transverse CP asymmetry"},
'ATRe': {'func_num': lambda y, J, J_bar, J_h: A_experiment_num_Bs(y, J, J_bar, J_h, 9)/4., 'tex': r'A_T^\text{2}', 'desc': "\"optimized\" angular CP asymmetry"},
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

There are several issues here:

  • The function used for the prediction of ATRe is just 1/2 times the one used for ATIm, which seems to be wrong.
  • The tex name of ATRe is A_T^\text{2}, which seems to be a different observable.




}
_hadr = {
'Bs->phi': {'tex': r"B_s\to \phi ", 'B': 'Bs', 'V': 'phi', },
'Bs->K*0': {'tex': r"B_s\to K^* ", 'B': 'Bs', 'V': 'K*0', },
}

def make_metadata_binned_Bs(M, l, obs, obsdict):
_process_tex = _hadr[M]['tex'] +_tex[l]+r"^+"+_tex[l]+r"^-"
_process_taxonomy = r'Process :: $b$ hadron decays :: FCNC decays :: $B\to V\ell^+\ell^-$ :: $' + _process_tex + r"$"
B = _hadr[M]['B']
V = _hadr[M]['V']
_obs_name = "<" + obs + ">("+M+l+l+")"
_obs = Observable(name=_obs_name, arguments=['q2min', 'q2max'])
_obs.set_description('Binned ' + obsdict['desc'] + r" in $" + _process_tex + r"$")
_obs.tex = r"$\langle " + obsdict['tex'] + r"\rangle(" + _process_tex + r")$"
_obs.add_taxonomy(_process_taxonomy)
return _obs


def make_metadata_differential_Bs(M, l, obs, obsdict):
_process_tex = _hadr[M]['tex'] +_tex[l]+r"^+"+_tex[l]+r"^-"
_process_taxonomy = r'Process :: $b$ hadron decays :: FCNC decays :: $B\to V\ell^+\ell^-$ :: $' + _process_tex + r"$"
B = _hadr[M]['B']
V = _hadr[M]['V']
_obs_name = obs + "("+M+l+l+")"
_obs = Observable(name=_obs_name, arguments=['q2'])
_obs.set_description(obsdict['desc'][0].capitalize() + obsdict['desc'][1:] + r" in $" + _process_tex + r"$")
_obs.tex = r"$" + obsdict['tex'] + r"(" + _process_tex + r")$"
_obs.add_taxonomy(_process_taxonomy)
return _obs
Copy link
Collaborator

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

These two functions make_metadata_binned_Bs and make_metadata_differential_Bs do not seem to be used anywhere at the moment.



for l in ['e', 'mu', 'tau']:
for M in _hadr.keys():

Expand All @@ -171,6 +243,25 @@ def fct(wc_obj, par):
_obs.add_taxonomy(_process_taxonomy)
Prediction(_obs_name, bsvll_obs_ratio_func(_observables[obs]['func_num'], SA_den_Bs, _hadr[M]['B'], _hadr[M]['V'], l))

for obs in sorted(_observables_p.keys()):

# binned angular observables
_obs_name = "<" + obs + ">("+M+l+l+")"
_obs = Observable(name=_obs_name, arguments=['q2min', 'q2max'])
_obs.set_description('Binned ' + _observables_p[obs]['desc'] + r" in $" + _hadr[M]['tex'] +_tex[l]+r"^+"+_tex[l]+"^-$")
_obs.tex = r"$\langle " + _observables_p[obs]['tex'] + r"\rangle(" + _hadr[M]['tex'] +_tex[l]+r"^+"+_tex[l]+"^-)$"
_obs.add_taxonomy(_process_taxonomy)
Prediction(_obs_name, bsvll_obs_int_ratio_func(_observables_p[obs]['func_num'], P_den_Bs, _hadr[M]['B'], _hadr[M]['V'], l))

# differential angular observables
_obs_name = obs + "("+M+l+l+")"
_obs = Observable(name=_obs_name, arguments=['q2'])
_obs.set_description(_observables_p[obs]['desc'][0].capitalize() + _observables_p[obs]['desc'][1:] + r" in $" + _hadr[M]['tex'] +_tex[l]+r"^+"+_tex[l]+"^-$")
_obs.tex = r"$" + _observables_p[obs]['tex'] + r"(" + _hadr[M]['tex'] +_tex[l]+r"^+"+_tex[l]+"^-)$"
_obs.add_taxonomy(_process_taxonomy)
Prediction(_obs_name, bsvll_obs_ratio_func(_observables_p[obs]['func_num'], P_den_Bs, _hadr[M]['B'], _hadr[M]['V'], l))


# binned branching ratio
_obs_name = "<dBR/dq2>("+M+l+l+")"
_obs = Observable(name=_obs_name, arguments=['q2min', 'q2max'])
Expand Down
Loading