-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 7
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
bugfix/klaviyo-too-many-partitions #26
bugfix/klaviyo-too-many-partitions #26
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
One small change but the rest lgtm!
Co-authored-by: fivetran-catfritz <[email protected]>
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fivetran-joemarkiewicz A few small CHANGELOG revisions.
Before approving, I also noticed that shopify_holistic_reporting__orders_attribution
(link) had similar partition by logic that was removed in dbt_klaviyo
. It seems created_timestamp
is involved in a join in that model, so it might hold more value than the partitions we've removed in dbt_klaviyo
, but I'm wondering if the config needs to be modified here to improve performance. Curious as to your thoughts here!
Co-authored-by: Avinash Kunnath <[email protected]>
@fivetran-avinash good callout on the partition present in the orders attribution model. After looking into it, I see we are aggressively partitioning on the timestamp grain for a field we aren't including in our incremental logic. Therefore, removing the partition would be more appropriate in this case. See the updated validations on the latest commit. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
@fivetran-joemarkiewicz Thanks for the quick turnaround! One small change, but otherwise good to go. Make sure to update the packages!
Co-authored-by: Avinash Kunnath <[email protected]>
PR Overview
This PR will address the following Issue/Feature:
v0.7.0
This PR will result in the following new package version: No linked issue as this is a result of an upstream change in the Klaviyo package. See dbt_klaviyo PR 41 for more details.
This is a breaking change due to the upstream changes which require a full refresh for bigquery users.
Please provide the finalized CHANGELOG entry which details the relevant changes included in this PR:
PR Checklist
Basic Validation
Please acknowledge that you have successfully performed the following commands locally:
Before marking this PR as "ready for review" the following have been applied:
Detailed Validation
Please share any and all of your validation steps:
See below for the results of the validation tests (full refresh and incremental runs)
If you had to summarize this PR in an emoji, which would it be?
🐟