-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 160
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Transpose interpolation -> adjoint interpolation #3965
Transpose interpolation -> adjoint interpolation #3965
Conversation
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
There's the caveat that this
|
@dham what are your thoughts? |
I'm fine with this because I think what James is proposing is mathematically correct. The small number of complex users that will even notice can deal with it. |
@jrmaddison please can you update this branch. We have just merged #3976 which will fix these test failures. |
c4d0a65
to
5836640
Compare
Done |
Updated to use |
Description
Replace transpose interpolation with adjoint interpolation, including the extra complex conjugation.
Fixes #3955