Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Upgrade dependencies, check numpy usage, and run modern black formatting #59

Merged
merged 1 commit into from
Jul 12, 2024

Conversation

CoolCat467
Copy link
Contributor

@CoolCat467 CoolCat467 commented Jun 17, 2024

Using ruff's new NPY201 check for helping upgrade to latest numpy version, and everything seems good.

Closes #58

Using ruff's new `NPY201` check for helping upgrade to latest numpy version.
Copy link
Owner

@fillipe-gsm fillipe-gsm left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

It looks good, thanks for the effort 🥇

@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@ def test_geo_tsplib_file():


def test_explicit_full_matrix_tsplib_file():
"""Note that this test file is asymetric"""
"""Note that this test file is asymmetric"""
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks for the catch :)

@@ -1,3 +1,4 @@
"""Auxiliar functions that may be used in most modules"""
"""Auxiliary functions that may be used in most modules"""
Copy link
Owner

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

👍

@fillipe-gsm fillipe-gsm merged commit b38179d into fillipe-gsm:master Jul 12, 2024
4 checks passed
@CoolCat467 CoolCat467 deleted the numpy-2.0 branch July 12, 2024 20:09
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

Numpy 2.0 support
2 participants