Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Text generation #643

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from
Open

Text generation #643

wants to merge 13 commits into from

Conversation

sjohn4
Copy link
Collaborator

@sjohn4 sjohn4 commented Jan 6, 2025

Redid my changes so we do not have two branching paths.

John Staib Matilla and others added 5 commits December 11, 2024 16:07
…dditionally, made minor updates to the environment and ensured everything passes the standard Python compliance tests, maintaining compatibility with Modyn's existing functionality.
…y have to most neccessary changes, removed unneccessary debug prints.
Copy link

codecov bot commented Jan 7, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 65.89595% with 59 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 85.29%. Comparing base (b04a2e1) to head (c924abc).

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../trainer_server/internal/dataset/online_dataset.py 69.44% 33 Missing ⚠️
modyn/models/GPT2/GPT2.py 55.00% 9 Missing ⚠️
...trainer_server/internal/trainer/pytorch_trainer.py 67.85% 9 Missing ⚠️
modyn/models/tokenizers/gpt2_tokenizer.py 38.46% 8 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##             main     #643      +/-   ##
==========================================
- Coverage   85.58%   85.29%   -0.29%     
==========================================
  Files         258      260       +2     
  Lines       11378    11467      +89     
==========================================
+ Hits         9738     9781      +43     
- Misses       1640     1686      +46     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

Copy link
Contributor

@MaxiBoether MaxiBoether left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Thanks John! Some first comments, the most important being that we should still make labels just an optional entry instead of having GetResponseNoLabels. For the next review, it would be cool if you could handle CI first, having a clean diff makes it a lot easier to review :)

environment.yml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modyn/config/schema/pipeline/training/config.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modyn/config/examples/modyn_config.yaml Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
modyn/config/schema/system/config.py Outdated Show resolved Hide resolved
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants