-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9.8k
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[3.5] [serverWatchStream] terminate recvLoop on sws.close() #18784
Conversation
Hi @veshij. Thanks for your PR. I'm waiting for a etcd-io member to verify that this patch is reasonable to test. If it is, they should reply with Once the patch is verified, the new status will be reflected by the I understand the commands that are listed here. Instructions for interacting with me using PR comments are available here. If you have questions or suggestions related to my behavior, please file an issue against the kubernetes-sigs/prow repository. |
Signed-off-by: Oleg Guba <[email protected]>
/ok-to-test |
It looks like we don't have the actuated runners available anymore. They were supposed to be available until the end of the month. @jmhbnz mentioned it in kubernetes/test-infra#33715. We're working on migrating the ARM64 workloads to the prow infra. I spotted the release-3.5 branch, which James will work on ( kubernetes/test-infra#33715 (review)). |
Thanks for the clarification. The arm64 support should be available until we finish migration all of them, including main and all stable releases, to prow. We need to unblock the PRs for 3.5. |
I'm not sure if that's something you can request from the CNCF. From looking at the error message, it seems like we don't have runners available anymore (https://github.com/etcd-io/etcd/actions/runs/11528005687/job/32094556498?pr=18784):
I can work tomorrow on migrating the ARM64 integration tests from the release-3.5 branch. Therefore, the jobs will run on the prow infra instead. |
Thanks. |
/retitle [3.5] [serverWatchStream] terminate recvLoop on sws.close() |
/test all |
/test pull-etcd-smoke-4-cpu-arm64 |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
From a backport point of view, it LGTM. Thanks, @veshij.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
LGTM
Thanks
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: ahrtr, ivanvc, serathius, veshij The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Link to #18704 |
Backport of #18739 to 3.5