Commits on Sep 23, 2015

1. Potential solution for mocks where we want to control -respondsToSele… …

   …ctor:. Problem noted at http://stackoverflow.com/questions/11923942/ocmock-mocking-protocols-with-excluding-optional-methods .  I want to test a class which has a delegate, and the behavior should be tested for situations where the delegate implements an optional method and also when it does not.  I could not figure out a way to do this with OCMock other than implementing a slew of individual classes which implement only the desired combination of methods for a particular test.  This approach is a subclass of OCProtocolMockObject, which implements -respondsToSelector: based on if there are any stubs, expects, or rejects added to the mock.  This way a unit test can control respondsTo status just by manipulating the expects or the stubs.  It is not a nice mock, so unexpected calls should still cause exceptions.  I'm not sure a "nice" version would make any sense, but it wouldn't to be hard to add if my imagination is just missing something.

   

   carllindberg committed Sep 23, 2015
   Configuration menu

   • View commit details
   • Copy full SHA for c9eb38f
   • Browse repository at this point

   Copy the full SHA

   c9eb38f View commit details

   Browse the repository at this point in the history