-
-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 408
Deprecate Computed #1129
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
base: main
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Deprecate Computed #1129
Conversation
b51b414
to
bfadfdd
Compare
Deprecation Guides: ember-learn/deprecation-app#1412 |
|
||
### Macro-by-Macro Replacement Patterns | ||
|
||
Below each macro lists: Purpose, Before, After (tracked + JS), and Codemod Strategy. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
FYI There is already a codemod available. I built one a while ago to completely migrate a codebase off macros: https://github.com/OTA-Insight/ember-computed-macro-codemod/
It does not cover all macro's though, so there's room to extend it.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Well that's a great start!
Is there a way to provide computed properties as an addon, for continued compatibility? There is only a subset of computed property usage that is easy to automate away - when the dependent key exists in the same context as the computed property. But computed properties can be dependent on state anywhere in the system, such as Services or other singleton or global patterns. The My main concern is that this deprecation will produce an amount of manual effort so great, it will rival the Ember 3->4 migration and create another pit to further fracture the userbase. Ember is particularly incoherent right now, and the level of incoherence at the time of Ember 6.12 could become crystalized if the 6->7 migration pathway is too labor intensive. I don't know much about the inner workings of the computed property system. Could the 'brains' be moved into a Service, and classes that uses computed properties decorated? I think the decorator would have to splash onto anything that needs the I don't think there would be a need for a |
it may be possible to provide a babel plugin that:
Your tech debt then becomes a list of babel plugins, which are easy to burn down over time (fewer babel plugins = better build perf? idk) |
Deprecate Computed
Rendered
Summary
This pull request is proposing a new RFC.
To succeed, it will need to pass into the Exploring Stage, followed by the Accepted Stage.
A Proposed or Exploring RFC may also move to the Closed Stage if it is withdrawn by the author or if it is rejected by the Ember team. This requires an "FCP to Close" period.
An FCP is required before merging this PR to advance to Accepted.
Upon merging this PR, automation will open a draft PR for this RFC to move to the Ready for Released Stage.
Exploring Stage Description
This stage is entered when the Ember team believes the concept described in the RFC should be pursued, but the RFC may still need some more work, discussion, answers to open questions, and/or a champion before it can move to the next stage.
An RFC is moved into Exploring with consensus of the relevant teams. The relevant team expects to spend time helping to refine the proposal. The RFC remains a PR and will have an
Exploring
label applied.An Exploring RFC that is successfully completed can move to Accepted with an FCP is required as in the existing process. It may also be moved to Closed with an FCP.
Accepted Stage Description
To move into the "accepted stage" the RFC must have complete prose and have successfully passed through an "FCP to Accept" period in which the community has weighed in and consensus has been achieved on the direction. The relevant teams believe that the proposal is well-specified and ready for implementation. The RFC has a champion within one of the relevant teams.
If there are unanswered questions, we have outlined them and expect that they will be answered before Ready for Release.
When the RFC is accepted, the PR will be merged, and automation will open a new PR to move the RFC to the Ready for Release stage. That PR should be used to track implementation progress and gain consensus to move to the next stage.
Checklist to move to Exploring
S-Proposed
is removed from the PR and the labelS-Exploring
is added.Checklist to move to Accepted
Final Comment Period
label has been added to start the FCP