fix: swap and bridge actions of plugin-evm #1456
Open
+106
−22
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
![github-actions[bot]](https://avatars.githubusercontent.com/in/15368?s=60&v=4){kind=small}
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Hi @pythonberg1997! Welcome to the ai16z community. Thanks for submitting your first pull request; your efforts are helping us accelerate towards AGI. We'll review it shortly. You are now a ai16z contributor!
pythonberg1997
changed the title
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Relates to:
Risks
Low
Background
The inputs of swap and bridge actions are not right.
What does this PR do?
This PR implements the missing swap and bridge functionalities in the plugin-evm.
What kind of change is this?
Bug fixes (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
Documentation changes needed?
My changes do not require a change to the project documentation.
Testing
Where should a reviewer start?
Detailed testing steps