Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Update RocksDB to 9.0.0 #38

Closed
wants to merge 1 commit into from

Conversation

alysenko-polytech
Copy link
Contributor

@alysenko-polytech alysenko-polytech commented Apr 11, 2024

@alysenko-polytech alysenko-polytech force-pushed the feat/641-update-rocksdb-9.0.0 branch 3 times, most recently from f6a1a6f to e9325da Compare April 11, 2024 18:28
@alysenko-polytech alysenko-polytech force-pushed the feat/641-update-rocksdb-9.0.0 branch from cc71e67 to 2864373 Compare April 11, 2024 18:47
@alysenko-polytech alysenko-polytech requested review from anelson and removed request for anelson April 11, 2024 19:04
@alysenko-polytech alysenko-polytech marked this pull request as draft April 12, 2024 08:47
@alysenko-polytech
Copy link
Contributor Author

    /// Verifies that, absent our polyfill, the Rocks iterator on a transaction ignores range
    /// parameters when creating an iterator.
    ///
    /// Hopefully some day https://github.com/facebook/rocksdb/issues/2343 is fixed and this test
    /// breaks.  If that happens, rejoice, delete the `TransactionRangeIterator`, and simplify the
    /// iterator code immensely!

Huh, they did fix it

@alysenko-polytech alysenko-polytech deleted the feat/641-update-rocksdb-9.0.0 branch April 12, 2024 18:35
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant