Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

fix: Notification counter now gets updated when reading a dialog (#1398) #1404

Open
wants to merge 1 commit into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

alexdigdir
Copy link
Collaborator

@alexdigdir alexdigdir commented Nov 27, 2024

CleanShot 2024-11-27 at 16 44 14

Hva er endret?

Related Issue(s)

Dokumentasjon / Storybook / testdekning

  • Dokumentasjon er oppdatert eller ikke relevant / nødvendig.
  • Ny komponent har en eller flere stories i Storybook, eller så er ikke dette relevant.
  • Det er blitt lagt til nye tester / eksiterende tester er blitt utvidet, eller tester er ikke relevant.

Skjermbilder eller GIFs (valgfritt)

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • New Features

    • Enhanced dialog fetching functionality with improved cache management for fresh data.
  • Bug Fixes

    • Ensured data consistency by invalidating queries upon successful data fetch.

@alexdigdir alexdigdir requested a review from a team as a code owner November 27, 2024 15:45
Copy link

coderabbitai bot commented Nov 27, 2024

📝 Walkthrough

Walkthrough

The pull request introduces modifications to the useDialogById.tsx file, primarily enhancing the useDialogById hook's functionality. A key addition is the useQueryClient hook from @tanstack/react-query, which enables cache manipulation. This allows for the invalidation of dialog-related queries upon successful data fetching, ensuring data consistency. The overall structure of the hook remains unchanged, with no alterations to the signatures of exported entities.

Changes

File Path Change Summary
packages/frontend/src/api/useDialogById.tsx Added useQueryClient import and implemented cache invalidation for dialog queries on success.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested reviewers

  • seanes

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

Copy link

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 1

📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 2cbf387 and ed91b61.

📒 Files selected for processing (1)
  • packages/frontend/src/api/useDialogById.tsx (3 hunks)
🔇 Additional comments (3)
packages/frontend/src/api/useDialogById.tsx (3)

1-1: LGTM: Clean import addition

The addition of useQueryClient import is appropriate for implementing cache invalidation.


186-186: LGTM: Proper hook initialization

The useQueryClient hook is correctly initialized at the top level of the component, following React hooks rules.


Line range hint 186-198: Verify the notification counter update behavior

Let's verify that this implementation properly updates the notification counter when reading a dialog.

✅ Verification successful

Based on the gathered information, I can now generate the final response:

Cache invalidation correctly triggers dialog list refresh with unread status

The implementation is correct for updating notification counters:

  • The GraphQL query SearchDialogFields includes seenSinceLastUpdate field which tracks read status
  • When a dialog is fetched (useDialogById), it invalidates the dialogs query cache
  • The invalidation triggers a refetch of getAllDialogsForParties query which includes the updated seen/unread status
  • The dialog list is automatically updated with fresh data including notification state
🏁 Scripts executed

The following scripts were executed for the analysis:

Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Description: Check if the notification counter is properly updated through the dialogs query

# Check for the notification counter implementation in the dialogs query
echo "Checking dialogs query implementation..."
rg -A 5 "notification.*count|unread.*count" 

# Check if the QUERY_KEYS.DIALOGS is used consistently
echo "Checking query key usage..."
rg "QUERY_KEYS\.DIALOGS"

# Look for any existing tests related to notification counting
echo "Checking related tests..."
fd -e test.tsx -e spec.tsx | xargs rg "notification.*count|unread.*count"

Length of output: 4374


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's check the implementation of useDialogs hook and the dialog data structure

# Check the useDialogs implementation
echo "Checking useDialogs implementation..."
ast-grep --pattern 'export function useDialogs($$$) {
  $$$
}'

# Check the dialog type/interface definition
echo "Checking dialog type definition..."
rg -A 10 "type.*Dialog.*=|interface.*Dialog.*{" 

# Check if there are any unread/notification count fields in GraphQL queries
echo "Checking GraphQL queries..."
fd -e graphql | xargs rg "unread|notification"

Length of output: 528


Script:

#!/bin/bash
# Let's fix the previous queries and check additional aspects

# Check the useDialogs implementation
echo "Checking useDialogs implementation..."
rg -A 10 "export.*function useDialogs"

# Check the dialog type definition with fixed regex
echo "Checking dialog type definition..."
rg -A 10 "(type Dialog|interface Dialog)"

# Check GraphQL operations related to dialogs
echo "Checking GraphQL operations..."
fd -e ts -e tsx | xargs rg "query GetDialogs|query GetDialogById"

# Check the actual GraphQL query definitions
echo "Checking GraphQL query definitions..."
fd -e graphql | xargs cat

Length of output: 10090

@@ -193,6 +194,8 @@ export const useDialogById = (parties: PartyFieldsFragment[], id?: string): UseD
enabled: typeof id !== 'undefined' && partyURIs.length > 0,
});

isSuccess && queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: [QUERY_KEYS.DIALOGS] });
Copy link

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

🛠️ Refactor suggestion

Consider optimizing the cache invalidation strategy

While the current implementation works, there are several potential improvements to consider:

  1. The invalidation is too broad and happens on every successful render.
  2. The short-circuit evaluation style reduces code readability.

Consider this more focused approach:

- isSuccess && queryClient.invalidateQueries({ queryKey: [QUERY_KEYS.DIALOGS] });
+ useEffect(() => {
+   if (isSuccess && data?.dialogById.dialog) {
+     // Only invalidate the specific dialog and the dialogs list
+     queryClient.invalidateQueries({
+       queryKey: [QUERY_KEYS.DIALOGS],
+       exact: true,
+     });
+     queryClient.invalidateQueries({
+       queryKey: [QUERY_KEYS.DIALOG_BY_ID, id],
+       exact: true,
+     });
+   }
+ }, [isSuccess, data, id, queryClient]);

This approach:

  • Uses a proper effect hook to handle side effects
  • More precisely targets the cache invalidation
  • Is more explicit about the execution conditions
  • Follows React's best practices for handling side effects

Committable suggestion skipped: line range outside the PR's diff.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant