Skip to content

Conversation

@prakash100198
Copy link
Contributor

Description

Fixes #

Checklist:

  • The title of the PR states what changed and the related issues number (used for the release note).
  • Does this PR requires documentation updates?
  • I've updated documentation as required by this PR.
  • I have performed a self-review of my own code.
  • I have commented my code, particularly in hard-to-understand areas.
  • I have tested it for all user roles.
  • I have added all the required unit/api test cases.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?


…tants

**Details**:
- Introduced `ClusterOverviewConfig` for configurable parameters.
- Added `ClusterCacheService` implementing in-memory caching for cluster data.
- Enhanced insights with `InsightsService` and queries for pipeline usage.
- Added new constants for cloud providers, autoscalers, and node statuses.
- Published various supporting services, adapters, and utility functions for modular interactions.
**Details**:
- Introduced `FindAllActiveInTimeRange` method in both `EnvironmentRepository` and `TeamRepository` for filtered querying based on time.
- Added `FindNamesByIds` in `EnvironmentRepository` for fetching environment names by IDs.
- Implemented environment trend aggregation with `GetAggregatedEnvironmentTrendWithParams`.
- Updated comments and query logics in repositories for clarity.
…an module

**Details**:
- Introduced new APIs for fetching vulnerability summary and listing with advanced filtering.
- Updated `ImageScanRestHandler` with handlers for the new endpoints.
- Enhanced `ImageScanService` to support vulnerability data aggregation, filtering, and pagination.
- Added `ScanStatus` filter for advanced scan state queries.
- Updated repositories and models for new data structures and query support.
@prakash100198 prakash100198 changed the base branch from main to develop December 12, 2025 07:29
@github-actions
Copy link

Some linked issues are invalid. Please update the issue links:\nIssue # in is not found or invalid (HTTP }404).\n

@bito-code-review
Copy link

Bito Automatic Review Skipped - Large PR

Bito didn't auto-review this change because the pull request exceeded the line limit. No action is needed if you didn't intend for the agent to review it. Otherwise, to manually trigger a review, type /review in a comment and save.

@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants