Enable shm_comm support for arm#7800
Conversation
8481aae to
6fe7cc1
Compare
6fe7cc1 to
a54558e
Compare
Signed-off-by: Phalani Paladugu <mailofphalani@gmail.com>
a54558e to
512fd0c
Compare
|
Overall looks good to me. I'm also glad that the refractory from @heyujiao99 in #7519 really helps alot! Around 100 lines of code to support a new HW architecture, wow! Kudos to @phalani-paladugu and @heyujiao99 ! |
Signed-off-by: Phalani Paladugu <mailofphalani@gmail.com>
23c68b5 to
119e8b7
Compare
|
Hi, is there a known issue with the cpu-torch-latest CI job? |
|
@phalani-paladugu, yes, something seems to be wrong with @loadams do you know what could be wrong? |
|
@phalani-paladugu FYI, @tohtana is investigating in the linked PR. |
|
Hi @phalani-paladugu, |
Head branch was pushed to by a user without write access
Signed-off-by: Phalani Paladugu <mailofphalani@gmail.com>
289903c to
0a20b6e
Compare
|
Hi @tohtana , |
|
All tests passed and the PR is merged now. This is a significant update. Thank you @phalani-paladugu for your contribution! |

This PR enables shared memory communication in single node for arm hosts - #7625