feat: add jams support

[lonerapier]

Motivation

Hopes to Resolve #54 ;)

[nmushegian]

Good now let’s add a test, I know we didn’t have one but that’s no excuse haha

[lonerapier]

Good now let’s add a test, I know we didn’t have one but that’s no excuse haha

Yup, that's what I was gonna ask. But current tests aren't working with this change.

Still getting module not found errors, when running tests.

[dmfxyz]

@dsam82 I cloned your fork and was able to get tests passing locally without any changes. are you still running onto this issue?

[lonerapier]

@dsam82 I cloned your fork and was able to get tests passing locally without any changes. are you still running onto this issue?

Unfortunately, yes. Have still added the tests, but can't remove this stupid error on my system.

[nmushegian]

This 3-way branch is not right, we have 2x2 options,

• Are we using a CID and fetching it from IPFS, or opening a local file?
• Is it JAMS or JSON?

[lonerapier]

Does this work?

if (isCid(arg)) {
  arg = getIpfsJson(arg)
} else {
 arg = (arg.split('.').pop() === 'jams')
    ? jams(readFileSync(arg))
    : require(arg)
}

[nmushegian]

This one is missing the case that it is a CID that points to a JAMS file, maybe refactor getIpfsJson to just getIpfsFile then branch from there, point is there are 4 cases

[stobiewan]

@dmfxyz Were you on the feat/jams-support branch when you had tests passing? I get the same failures

[dmfxyz]

@dsam82 I cloned your fork and was able to get tests passing locally without any changes. are you still running onto this issue?

Ignore this -- I was on the wrong branch.