Skip to content

Security: craftcms/fix-fks

Security

SECURITY.md

Security Policy

Products Covered

This security policy covers Craft CMS, Craft Commerce, Craft Cloud, and Pixel & Tonic 1st-party plugins.

Reporting a Vulnerability

If you discover a security vulnerability, please review these guidelines before submitting a report. We take security seriously and do our best to resolve security issues as quickly as possible.

Guidelines

While working to identify potential security vulnerabilities, we ask that you:

  • Share any issues you discover with us via our website, [email protected], or [email protected] as soon as possible.
  • Give us reasonable time to address and release any fixes for reported issues before publicizing them. Preferably 30 days.
  • Only report issues in scope.
  • Provide a quality report with precise explanations and concrete attack scenarios.
  • Ensure you’re aware of the versions of Craft CMS and Craft Commerce that are actively receiving security fixes. Craft Cloud is always open to receive security fixes.

Scope

Craft CMS, Craft Commerce, and plugins

We are interested in vulnerabilities that affect Craft or first-party Craft plugins, tested against your local installation of the software. You can install a local copy of Craft by following these installation instructions. Do not test against any Craft installation you don’t own, including craftcms.com.

Craft Cloud

We are interested in infrastructure-related vulnerabilities found on Craft Cloud.

Do not test against any Craft Cloud site you don’t own, and do not perform any tests that degrade the Craft Cloud’s services.

We are only interested in reports directly from the security researcher who discovered them, not from third-party bug bounty programs.

Qualifying Vulnerabilities

Non-Qualifying Vulnerabilities

  • Reports from automated tools or scanners
  • Theoretical attacks without proof of exploitability
  • Attacks that can be guarded against by following our security recommendations.
  • Server configuration issues outside of Craft’s control
  • Denial of Service attacks
  • Brute force attacks (e.g. on password or token hashes)
  • Username or email address enumeration
  • Social engineering of Pixel & Tonic staff or users of Craft installations
  • Physical attacks against Craft installations
  • Attacks involving physical access to a user’s device or involving a device or network that’s already seriously compromised (e.g. man-in-the-middle attacks)
  • Attacks that are the result of a third-party Craft plugin should be reported to the plugin’s author
  • Attacks that are the result of a third-party library should be reported to the library maintainers
  • Bugs that rely on unlikely user interactions (i.e., the user effectively attacking themselves)
  • Disclosure of tools or libraries used by Craft and/or their versions
  • Issues that are the result of a user ignoring common security best practices (like sharing their password publicly)
  • Missing security headers that do not lead directly to a vulnerability via proof of concept
  • Vulnerabilities affecting users of outdated/unsupported browsers or platforms
  • Vulnerabilities affecting outdated versions of Craft
  • Any behavior that is clearly documented
  • Issues discovered while scanning a site you don’t own without permission
  • Missing CSRF tokens on forms (unless you have a proof of concept, many forms either don’t need CSRF or are mitigated in other ways) and “logout” CSRF attacks
  • Open redirects

Bounties

We’re happy to offer researchers a monetary reward to show our appreciation for the work it can take to find and report a vulnerability.

Reward amounts vary depending on the severity. Our minimum reward for a qualifying vulnerability report is $50 USD, and we expect to pay $500+ USD for significant vulnerabilities.

A report will qualify for a bounty if:

  • Our Guidelines have been followed in full.
  • The vulnerability was previously unknown to us, or your report provides more information or shows the vulnerability to be more extensive than we initially thought.
  • The vulnerability is non-trivial.

There aren’t any published security advisories