Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Recommendation 10 updates for look-back period and 2022-compliant response #343

Open
wants to merge 13 commits into
base: master
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

c-schuler
Copy link
Collaborator

@c-schuler c-schuler commented Jun 15, 2023

Note: this PR requires an enhancement in the cqf-ruler to be approved and merged before it will pass testing (or use the following cqf-ruler branch for testing)

  • Updated look-back period for labs to include today (added rationale in the functional description)
  • Updated response to align with 2022 updates (updated test suite as well - including results from running refreshTestData script)
  • Updated pilot bundles
  • Added unexpected result logic for additional decision points introduced in 2022 update

else if GetNegativeScreeningsCount(Screenings) > 0 then
'<br />*Positive for ' + Type + ': ' +
Combine(GetPositiveDates(Screenings), ', ') +
' (' + ToString(GetNegativeScreeningsCount(Screenings)) +
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯 way more readable, thanks for making that a more generic definition!

if isScreeningRecommended
then 'Consider the benefits and risks of toxicology testing to assess for prescribed medications as well as other prescribed and nonprescribed controlled substances.'
else if "Applicable Because of Unexpected Results"
then 'Patient May Have Unexpected Toxicology Test Results'
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

💯 way more readable, thanks for making that a more generic definition!

and MR.medication is Reference or (MR.medication in "Opioid analgesics with ambulatory misuse potential"
and not (MR.medication in "Non-synthetic opioid medications"))
and MR.medication is Reference or (MR.medication in "Opioid Analgesics with Ambulatory Misuse Potential"
and not (MR.medication in "Nonsynthetic Opioid Medications"))
else
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

just for myself to know: is this naming convention of capital starting letters documented anywhere?

"code": [ {
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category",
"code": "laboratory"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"type": "Observation",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

original observation

"code": [ {
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category",
"code": "laboratory"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"type": "Observation",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

first copy

"code": [ {
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category",
"code": "laboratory"
} ]
} ]
}, {
"type": "Observation",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

2nd copy

} ]
} ]
}, {
"type": "Observation",
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

4x identical observations added in addition

"path": "category",
"code": [ {
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category",
"code": "laboratory"
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also here, many identical data requirments of type Observation.

"code": [ {
"system": "http://terminology.hl7.org/CodeSystem/observation-category",
"code": "laboratory"
} ]
Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

also here, many identical data requirements of type Observation

Copy link
Contributor

@alackerbauer alackerbauer left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Looking good! The only thing that I have noticed is that there is duplicated dataRequirement definitions for the resource type "Observation" of type laboratory in the following files:

  • plandefinition/opioidcds-10.json
  • library/OpioidCDSREC10.json
  • plandefinition/opioidcds-10-patient-view.json
  • plandefinition/opioidcds-10-order-sign.json

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants