Open
Conversation
added 2 commits
July 3, 2025 17:47
# Conflicts: # docs/configuring.md
Member
|
Thanks for creating this PR to implement nested prompts, @dellekappa! 🙇 I'll give feedback ASAP. |
Author
|
@sisp I made a new PR. It is internally a completely different implementation, much easier to mantain and more in line with this sentence in the #751 issue:
implementing #750 on top of this would be much easier. |
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This PR relates to issue #751
Some reasoning follows:
dictthat will be rendered, as expected, as adictin jinja context. This is why I useddictinstead ofnestedproperty.propertysynthax has been used. Under the hood this is handled by dpath. This permits the user to easily specify an answer value from the command line at any hierarchy level.