Skip to content

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Jun 24, 2025

As the title says

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <[email protected]>
@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added release-note-none approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. labels Jun 24, 2025
@github-actions github-actions bot added the do-not-merge/wait-machine-os-build Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is waiting on machine OS images to build label Jun 24, 2025
Copy link
Member

@Luap99 Luap99 left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

LGTM

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Jun 24, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: Luap99, mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@baude
Copy link
Member

baude commented Jun 24, 2025

/lgtm

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. label Jun 24, 2025
Copy link

Building images at: containers/podman-machine-os#150

@podmanbot podmanbot removed the do-not-merge/wait-machine-os-build Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is waiting on machine OS images to build label Jun 24, 2025
@openshift-merge-bot openshift-merge-bot bot merged commit 845819a into containers:v5.5 Jun 24, 2025
82 of 83 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. lgtm Indicates that a PR is ready to be merged. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants