-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 2.8k
[CI:ALL] Bump to v5.5.0-RC1 #25957
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[CI:ALL] Bump to v5.5.0-RC1 #25957
Conversation
Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Matt Heon <[email protected]>
[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED This pull-request has been approved by: mheon The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here. The pull request process is described here
Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:
Approvers can indicate their approval by writing |
Please remove the dev bump, it needs to be done in a separate PR (to be automated soon, manual for now) |
Ah, oops |
Needs a rebase after #25967 merges. |
- Fixed a bug where Podman containers would try to set increased rlimits when started in a user namespace, rendering containers unable to start ([#24508](https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/24508)). | ||
- Fixed a bug where certain SSH configurations would make the remote Podman client unable to connect to the server ([#24567](https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/24567)). | ||
- Fixed a bug where the Windows installer could install WSLv2 when upgrading an existing Podman installation that used the Hyper-V virtualization backend. | ||
|
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Why is the v5.4 and below stuff new here? Did that not get published prior?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Yeah, it looks like the release notes never made it to main from the branches.
Taking over at #25970, as Matt is out today, and we want to push forward with testing the process with this RC. |
As the title says.
Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?