Skip to content

Conversation

mheon
Copy link
Member

@mheon mheon commented Apr 23, 2025

As the title says.

Does this PR introduce a user-facing change?

NONE

Copy link
Contributor

openshift-ci bot commented Apr 23, 2025

[APPROVALNOTIFIER] This PR is APPROVED

This pull-request has been approved by: mheon

The full list of commands accepted by this bot can be found here.

The pull request process is described here

Needs approval from an approver in each of these files:

Approvers can indicate their approval by writing /approve in a comment
Approvers can cancel approval by writing /approve cancel in a comment

@openshift-ci openshift-ci bot added the approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. label Apr 23, 2025
@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member

Please remove the dev bump, it needs to be done in a separate PR (to be automated soon, manual for now)

@mheon
Copy link
Member Author

mheon commented Apr 23, 2025

Ah, oops

@github-actions github-actions bot added the do-not-merge/wait-machine-os-build Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is waiting on machine OS images to build label Apr 23, 2025
@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member

Needs a rebase after #25967 merges.

- Fixed a bug where Podman containers would try to set increased rlimits when started in a user namespace, rendering containers unable to start ([#24508](https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/24508)).
- Fixed a bug where certain SSH configurations would make the remote Podman client unable to connect to the server ([#24567](https://github.com/containers/podman/issues/24567)).
- Fixed a bug where the Windows installer could install WSLv2 when upgrading an existing Podman installation that used the Hyper-V virtualization backend.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Why is the v5.4 and below stuff new here? Did that not get published prior?

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Yeah, it looks like the release notes never made it to main from the branches.

@ashley-cui ashley-cui mentioned this pull request Apr 24, 2025
@ashley-cui
Copy link
Member

Taking over at #25970, as Matt is out today, and we want to push forward with testing the process with this RC.

@ashley-cui ashley-cui closed this Apr 24, 2025
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot added the locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. label Jul 24, 2025
@stale-locking-app stale-locking-app bot locked as resolved and limited conversation to collaborators Jul 24, 2025
Sign up for free to subscribe to this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in.
Labels
approved Indicates a PR has been approved by an approver from all required OWNERS files. do-not-merge/wait-machine-os-build Indicates that a PR should not merge because it is waiting on machine OS images to build locked - please file new issue/PR Assist humans wanting to comment on an old issue or PR with locked comments. release-note-none
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants