Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

[tsh] Initial support for teleport tsh, GEODESIC_PORT #452

Merged
merged 2 commits into from
Apr 17, 2019
Merged

Conversation

Nuru
Copy link
Contributor

@Nuru Nuru commented Apr 17, 2019

what

  • Initial support for Teleport
  • Rename KUBERNETES_API_PORT to GEODESIC_PORT

why

@Nuru Nuru requested a review from osterman April 17, 2019 19:24
@@ -150,7 +150,7 @@ function use() {
--publish ${GEODESIC_PORT}:${GEODESIC_PORT}
--name "${DOCKER_NAME}"
--rm
--env KUBERNETES_API_PORT=${GEODESIC_PORT})
--env GEODESIC_PORT=${GEODESIC_PORT})
Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I'm not sure about ports

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

I support this. I want to generalize it so we can use it for both kubectl and teleport. The port can be overloaded,

Copy link
Member

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Also, I like the consistency where the LHS==RHS env name

@Nuru Nuru merged commit 5c91f56 into master Apr 17, 2019
@Nuru Nuru deleted the teleport branch April 18, 2019 04:57
@Nuru Nuru changed the title [tsh] Initial support for teleport tsh [tsh] Initial support for teleport tsh, GEODESIC_PORT Apr 18, 2019
leb4r pushed a commit that referenced this pull request Jan 25, 2022
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants