Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

FAQ:kops vs. kubeadm #447

Merged
merged 5 commits into from
Apr 23, 2019
Merged

FAQ:kops vs. kubeadm #447

merged 5 commits into from
Apr 23, 2019

Conversation

drnickiw
Copy link
Contributor

what

  • kops vs. kubeadm FAQ

why

  • Imported from Google Doc

Links to #353

@drnickiw
Copy link
Contributor Author

@osterman I didn't include markdown syntax for the "title:" portion because it didn't appear appropriately when I previewed it in Atom. I left it out of the title for that reason. Didn't want you to think I didn't catch it. I assumed that, because it was the title, that it didn't properly appear and you didn't want to see the ticks.

Copy link
Member

@osterman osterman left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

See comments

@osterman
Copy link
Member

I didn't include markdown syntax for the "title:" portion because it didn't appear appropriately when I previewed it in Atom.

Aha, so the reason you don't see it in Atom, is because that part is in what's called the "frontmatter". The "frontmatter" is actually YAML. However, when the template engine renders the frontmatter, the markdown will be processed.

Didn't want you to think I didn't catch it.

No worries, thanks for being vigilant.

@drnickiw
Copy link
Contributor Author

drnickiw commented Apr 20, 2019 via email

@osterman osterman merged commit 72fcc6f into master Apr 23, 2019
@osterman osterman deleted the kops-vs-kubeadm branch April 23, 2019 06:19
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants