Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Add determine-chunk-shape notebook #31

Draft
wants to merge 3 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

abarciauskas-bgse
Copy link
Contributor

@abarciauskas-bgse abarciauskas-bgse commented Aug 18, 2023

This question comes up so often and I wanted to try out the new method in pangeo-forge/pangeo-forge-recipes#546 that I thought we might add some basic information on how to think about the question of chunk shape and size.

@review-notebook-app
Copy link

Check out this pull request on  ReviewNB

See visual diffs & provide feedback on Jupyter Notebooks.


Powered by ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,665 @@
{
Copy link
Member

@kylebarron kylebarron Aug 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Line #16.        # we can set lon to 2 and lat to 1 since we expect twice as many chunks along the lon dimension as the lat dimension.

Maybe also mention what setting -1 does?


Reply via ReviewNB

@@ -0,0 +1,665 @@
{
Copy link
Member

@kylebarron kylebarron Aug 22, 2023

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

100MB

If direct-to-frontend Zarr visualization ever happens, having such large chunks would be a blocker because the frontend would have to download a minimum of one chunk before anything displays.


Reply via ReviewNB

@abarciauskas-bgse
Copy link
Contributor Author

Thanks for reviewing @kylebarron - headsup I am planning to post this for feedback on pangeo discourse before merging.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants