Linting fixes #91
Merged
Linting fixes #91
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
Both ruff and black typically change their linting rules at the start of the year.
Even without using `tabulate`, it had fallen behind what actually happened.
ketiltrout
force-pushed
the
linting_fixes
branch
from
d88ead5 to
2ce030a
Compare
ssiegelx
approved these changes
Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
This updates the code for changes to
blackandruff. It's almost entirely getting rid of the old"%s%d" % (var1, var2)"formatting style.However, to simplify things, I've introduced a
tabulatedependency to take care of rendering the results table infinder, instead of the Finder doing the tabulation manually.And, just to make sure I hadn't introduced a bug, I went through the worked example in the docstring and updated it for the
tabulate-generated tables.