CIP-???? | NFT and Token Authentication

[emir-olgun]

Metadata Standard for using NFT and Tokens for authentication.

---

(rendered latest version)

[rphair]

@emir-olgun this is a vital application that needs a solid standard for it.

Please also have a look at the method proposed in #294 (@Padierfind) - since the methods in that proposal went quite far through community review and approval before the author abandoned the document.

First you will have to follow the document structure defined in CIP-0001. It looks like you have copied the text from an old CIP but will observe that CIPs today follow a different structure, which even the older CIPs have been edited to adopt. We can review this more fully when you've made your best effort to adjust to that format: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0001/README.md#document

[rphair]

Suggested change

	# CIP-?: NFT and Token Authentication
	---
	- **CIP**: ?
	- **Title**: NFT and Token Authentication
	- **Authors**: Emir Olgun <[email protected]>
	- **Discussions-To**: https://github.com/littlefish-foundation/CIPs/discussions
	- **Status**: Proposed
	- **Created**: 2024-09-17
	- **License**: CC-BY-4.0
	---
	---
	CIP: ?
	Title: NFT and Token Authentication
	Authors:
	- Emir Olgun <[email protected]>
	Discussions:
	- https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/pull/917
	Implementors: []
	Status: Proposed
	Created: 2024-09-17
	License: CC-BY-4.0
	---

The most important change (besides the wrong document structure below): this is not a human readable list, but rather a YAML metadata section: https://github.com/cardano-foundation/CIPs/blob/master/CIP-0001/README.md#header-preamble

[Ryun1]

Suggested change

# CIP-?: NFT and Token Authentication

[rphair]

yes @emir-olgun - as already suggested in #917 (comment), it's a requirement that this H1 be removed which in any case is redundant with the CIP title in the file metadata.

[rphair]

@emir-olgun after initial discussion of this submission at the CIP Editors' meeting today, we can't move ahead with this unless you engage about the basic format issues & try to respond about the already posted comments. Please take the above suggestions into account & otherwise this should be marked Waiting for Author soon.

[rphair]

@emir-olgun marking this Waiting for Author as per #917 (comment).

[rphair]

@emir-olgun we do need you to please engage with CIP reviewers if this submission is to be kept open.