-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 103
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Publish mir*-internal
libraries
#3283
Comments
Headers To Publish
@Saviq , @AlanGriffiths , @RAOF , and @hbatagelo : Are there any other headers that you'd like to see published here? Should any of these be removed or renamed? |
I don't think there's any need to split the test/testframework stuff up. Just one package with the headers and libraries should be the way. (But the content is likely a mess) Not sure that there's any point to What are you considering for There's some obviously dead stuff in That leaves |
There's also |
And back to libmirrenderer-dev: this looks dubious...
I.e. there's no library dependency supplying the functions (which appear to live in |
Agreed
Yup, I was skeptical of that too
That would be our GL Renderer implementation if we want to give people the ability to extend it or something. Probably not useful IMO.
Agreed that we can remove some headers there |
Oh there's no |
It actually seems like we already publish test headers, so that isn't necesary |
I don't think we need a dependency supplying the functions, since the headers in |
We should publish |
Problem
Having worked on miracle for a couple months now, I'm finding that I'd be able to take it to the next level (e.g. animations, custom renderer, etc.) if I had access to Mir's internal APIs (e.g. the
Surface
,Renderer
, etc.).Solution
It would be nice to publish these as "unstable" APIs for 3rd-party consumers who know what they're doing. This will also have the extra benefit of better exposing what is required for
mirAL
to be complete.The text was updated successfully, but these errors were encountered: