Url check to include redirect

[jdkandersson]

Closes #40

• Adds an additional check to ensure that the topic URL resolves on discourse
• Relaxes the URL checks to be after any redirects

[jdkandersson]

There seems to be a problem, changing this to draft for now

[jdkandersson]

Issue fixed, ready for review

[gregory-schiano]

LGTM

[arturo-seijas]

Can we do something about the docker linter suggestion?

[jdkandersson]

Had to merge changes from main, another review please

[github-actions]

Test coverage for be685e5

Name                      Stmts   Miss Branch BrPart  Cover   Missing
---------------------------------------------------------------------
src/__init__.py              42      0      6      0   100%
src/action.py               128      0     36      0   100%
src/discourse.py            147      0     32      0   100%
src/docs_directory.py        29      0      8      0   100%
src/exceptions.py            11      0      0      0   100%
src/index.py                 30      0      6      0   100%
src/metadata.py              28      0     12      0   100%
src/migration.py            106      0     35      0   100%
src/navigation_table.py      53      0     16      0   100%
src/pull_request.py          88      0     16      0   100%
src/reconcile.py             66      0     34      0   100%
src/types_.py               123      0     22      0   100%
---------------------------------------------------------------------
TOTAL                       851      0    223      0   100%

Static code analysis report

Run started:2023-01-24 11:54:13.442706

Test results:
  No issues identified.

Code scanned:
  Total lines of code: 8023
  Total lines skipped (#nosec): 16
  Total potential issues skipped due to specifically being disabled (e.g., #nosec BXXX): 0

Run metrics:
  Total issues (by severity):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
  Total issues (by confidence):
  	Undefined: 0
  	Low: 0
  	Medium: 0
  	High: 0
Files skipped (0):

[gtrkiller]

LGTM

[gregory-schiano]

LGTM

[jdkandersson]

Can we do something about the docker linter suggestion?

Thanks for the prompt, I didn't see the comment before merging. This action's use of docker has some opportunities for improvement I have been thinking about. The docker build takes a considerable amount of time now and it would be good to just have an image for the action stored somewhere so it doesn't have to be built every time. This isn't a simple change because it also means that the testing needs to be changed and increases the complexity of releases and the workflow for pull requests. I'll add an issue to improve the use of docker which we can eventually get to.

• Fixed the issue on this PR: fix docker lint issue and upgrade to python 3.11 #89
• Added issue to improve the use of docker: Improve the use of docker #88