-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 1
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
Update MPS
manual in docs
#262
base: master
Are you sure you want to change the base?
Changes from all commits
f3b2c4f
a9623a6
20c4ef2
e18b5f7
f8c3470
c2a63bc
1372e1a
8d53a34
1cad26e
1bde3fc
File filter
Filter by extension
Conversations
Jump to
Diff view
Diff view
There are no files selected for viewing
Original file line number | Diff line number | Diff line change | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
@@ -1,8 +1,9 @@ | ||||||||
# Matrix Product States (MPS) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Matrix Product States (MPS) are a Quantum Tensor Network ansatz whose tensors are laid out in a 1D chain. | ||||||||
Due to this, these networks are also known as _Tensor Trains_ in other mathematical fields. | ||||||||
Depending on the boundary conditions, the chains can be open or closed (i.e. periodic boundary conditions). | ||||||||
Matrix Product States ([`MPS`](@ref)) are a Quantum Tensor Network ansatz whose tensors are laid out in a 1D chain. | ||||||||
Due to this, these networks are also known as _Tensor Trains_ in other scientific fields. | ||||||||
Depending on the boundary conditions, the chains can be open or closed (i.e. periodic boundary conditions), currently | ||||||||
only `Open` boundary conditions are supported in `Tenet`. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
```@setup viz | ||||||||
using Makie | ||||||||
|
@@ -16,38 +17,102 @@ using NetworkLayout | |||||||
``` | ||||||||
|
||||||||
```@example viz | ||||||||
fig = Figure() # hide | ||||||||
fig = Figure() | ||||||||
open_mps = rand(MPS; n=10, maxdim=4) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
tn_open = rand(MatrixProduct{State,Open}, n=10, χ=4) # hide | ||||||||
tn_periodic = rand(MatrixProduct{State,Periodic}, n=10, χ=4) # hide | ||||||||
plot!(fig[1,1], open_mps, layout=Spring(iterations=1000, C=0.5, seed=100)) | ||||||||
Label(fig[1,1, Bottom()], "Open") | ||||||||
|
||||||||
plot!(fig[1,1], tn_open, layout=Spring(iterations=1000, C=0.5, seed=100)) # hide | ||||||||
plot!(fig[1,2], tn_periodic, layout=Spring(iterations=1000, C=0.5, seed=100)) # hide | ||||||||
fig | ||||||||
``` | ||||||||
|
||||||||
The default ordering of the indices on the `MPS` constructor is (physical, left, right), but you can specify the ordering by passing the `order` keyword argument: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
```@example | ||||||||
mps = MPS([rand(4, 2), rand(4, 8, 2), rand(8, 2)]; order=[:l, :r, :o]) | ||||||||
``` | ||||||||
where `:l`, `:r`, and `:o` represent the left, right, and outer physical indices, respectively. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Label(fig[1,1, Bottom()], "Open") # hide | ||||||||
Label(fig[1,2, Bottom()], "Periodic") # hide | ||||||||
|
||||||||
fig # hide | ||||||||
### Canonical Forms | ||||||||
|
||||||||
An `MPS` representation is not unique: a single `MPS` can be represented in different canonical forms. The choice of canonical form can affect the efficiency and stability of algorithms used to manipulate the `MPS`. | ||||||||
The current form of the `MPS` is stored as the trait [`Form`](@ref) and can be accessed via the `form` function: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. Depending on the form, Tenet will dispatch under the hood the appropriate algorithm which makes full use of the canonical form, so be careful when making modifications that might alter the form without changing the trait. |
||||||||
```@example | ||||||||
mps = MPS([rand(2, 2), rand(2, 2, 2), rand(2, 2)]) | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
form(mps) | ||||||||
``` | ||||||||
> :warning: Depending on the form, `Tenet` will dispatch under the hood the appropriate algorithm which assumes full use of the canonical form, so be careful when making modifications that might alter the canonical form without changing the trait. | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I don't think this should be a warning.
what does this mean?
Users must not modify the form field directly; the public API is to call So I would just put the first part of the paragraph. You can put it in a info box if you want. There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I mean, if a user does |
||||||||
|
||||||||
`Tenet` has the internal function [`Tenet.check_form`](@ref) to check if the `MPS` is in the correct canonical form. This function can be used to ensure that the `MPS` is in the correct form before performing any operation that requires it. | ||||||||
Currently, `Tenet` supports the [`NonCanonical`](@ref), [`CanonicalForm`](@ref) and [`MixedCanonical`](@ref) forms. | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
#### `NonCanonical` Form | ||||||||
In the `NonCanonical` form, the tensors in the `MPS` do not satisfy any particular orthogonality conditions. This is the default `form` when an `MPS` is initialized without specifying a canonical form. It is useful for general purposes but may not be optimal for certain computations that benefit from orthogonality. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
#### `Canonical` Form | ||||||||
Also known as Vidal's form, the `Canonical` form represents the `MPS` using a sequence of isometric tensors (`Γ`) and diagonal vectors (`λ`) containing the Schmidt coefficients. The `MPS` is expressed as: | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Suggested change
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
```math | ||||||||
| \psi \rangle = \sum_{i_1, \dots, i_N} \Gamma_1^{i_1} \lambda_2 \Gamma_2^{i_2} \dots \lambda_{N-1} \Gamma_{N-1}^{i_{N-1}} \lambda_N \Gamma_N^{i_N} | i_1, \dots, i_N \rangle \, . | ||||||||
``` | ||||||||
|
||||||||
You can convert an `MPS` to the `Canonical` form by calling `canonize!`: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
```@example | ||||||||
mps = MPS([rand(2, 2), rand(2, 2, 2), rand(2, 2)]) | ||||||||
canonize!(mps) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
form(mps) | ||||||||
Comment on lines
+67
to
+68
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. maybe better remove this? or maybe better use https://documenter.juliadocs.org/stable/man/syntax/#@repl-block |
||||||||
``` | ||||||||
|
||||||||
#### `MixedCanonical` Form | ||||||||
In the `MixedCanonical` form, tensors to the left of the orthogonality center are left-canonical, tensors to the right are right-canonical, and the tensors at the orthogonality center (which can be `Site` or `Vector{<:Site}`) contains the entanglement information between the left and right parts of the chain. The position of the orthogonality center is stored in the `orthog_center` field. | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. You need to explain what is left-/right-canonical There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I'm not convinced by this phrase but I don't know how to rephrase it jajajaj any idea @arturgs @starsfordummies? There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. I'd just remove the sentence "and the tensors... " |
||||||||
|
||||||||
You can convert an `MPS` to the `MixedCanonical` form and specify the orthogonality center using `mixed_canonize!`. Additionally, one can check that the `MPS` is effectively in mixed canonical form using the functions `isleftcanonical` and `isrightcanonical`, which return `true` if the `Tensor` at that particular site is left or right canonical, respectively. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
```@example | ||||||||
mps = MPS([rand(2, 2), rand(2, 2, 2), rand(2, 2)]) | ||||||||
mixed_canonize!(mps, Site(2)) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
isisometry(mps, 1; dir=:right) # Check if the first tensor is left canonical | ||||||||
isisometry(mps, 3; dir=:left) # Check if the third tensor is right canonical | ||||||||
``` | ||||||||
|
||||||||
form(mps) | ||||||||
``` | ||||||||
|
||||||||
jofrevalles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||
##### Additional Resources | ||||||||
For more in-depth information on Matrix Product States and their canonical forms, you may refer to: | ||||||||
- Schollwöck, U. (2011). The density-matrix renormalization group in the age of matrix product states. Annals of physics, 326(1), 96-192. | ||||||||
There was a problem hiding this comment. Choose a reason for hiding this commentThe reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more. ahh for this kind of citations we had a Documenter plugin that I've disabled. we can reenable it. look for DocumenterCitations.jl |
||||||||
|
||||||||
|
||||||||
## Matrix Product Operators (MPO) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Matrix Product Operators (MPO) are the operator version of [Matrix Product State (MPS)](#matrix-product-states-mps). | ||||||||
The major difference between them is that MPOs have 2 indices per site (1 input and 1 output) while MPSs only have 1 index per site (i.e. an output). | ||||||||
Matrix Product Operators ([`MPO`](@ref)) are the operator version of [Matrix Product State (MPS)](#matrix-product-states-mps). | ||||||||
The major difference between them is that MPOs have 2 indices per site (1 input and 1 output) while MPSs only have 1 index per site (i.e. an output). Currently, only `Open` boundary conditions are supported in `Tenet`. | ||||||||
|
||||||||
```@example viz | ||||||||
fig = Figure() # hide | ||||||||
fig = Figure() | ||||||||
open_mpo = rand(MPO, n=10, maxdim=4) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
tn_open = rand(MatrixProduct{Operator,Open}, n=10, χ=4) # hide | ||||||||
tn_periodic = rand(MatrixProduct{Operator,Periodic}, n=10, χ=4) # hide | ||||||||
plot!(fig[1,1], open_mpo, layout=Spring(iterations=1000, C=0.5, seed=100)) | ||||||||
Label(fig[1,1, Bottom()], "Open") | ||||||||
|
||||||||
plot!(fig[1,1], tn_open, layout=Spring(iterations=1000, C=0.5, seed=100)) # hide | ||||||||
plot!(fig[1,2], tn_periodic, layout=Spring(iterations=1000, C=0.5, seed=100)) # hide | ||||||||
fig | ||||||||
``` | ||||||||
|
||||||||
Label(fig[1,1, Bottom()], "Open") # hide | ||||||||
Label(fig[1,2, Bottom()], "Periodic") # hide | ||||||||
To apply an `MPO` to an `MPS`, you can use the `evolve!` function: | ||||||||
|
||||||||
jofrevalles marked this conversation as resolved.
Show resolved
Hide resolved
|
||||||||
fig # hide | ||||||||
``` | ||||||||
```@example | ||||||||
mps = rand(MPS; n=10, maxdim=100) | ||||||||
mpo = rand(MPO; n=10, maxdim=4) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
size.(tensors(mps)) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
evolve!(mps, mpo) | ||||||||
|
||||||||
In `Tenet`, the generic `MatrixProduct` ansatz implements this topology. Type variables are used to address their functionality (`State` or `Operator`) and their boundary conditions (`Open` or `Periodic`). | ||||||||
size.(tensors(mps)) | ||||||||
``` |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There is a weird newline there. But also, this is the kind of information that can better be in a warning box.