chore(codeowners): Simplify codeowners to support mergify restrictions #1948
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
|
Verified that @jstoffan has signed the CLA. Thanks for the pull request! |
jstoffan
force-pushed
the
codeowners-fix
branch
3 times, most recently
from
b2fd118 to
e791536
Compare
jstoffan
changed the title
jstoffan
force-pushed
the
codeowners-fix
branch
3 times, most recently
from
ad6d334 to
20bd64b
Compare
alexkrolick
reviewed
Feb 19, 2020
jstoffan
force-pushed
the
codeowners-fix
branch
3 times, most recently
from
c8172e1 to
bd995cd
Compare
alexkrolick
previously approved these changes
Feb 19, 2020
jstoffan
force-pushed
the
codeowners-fix
branch
from
bd995cd to
78a2caf
Compare
alexkrolick
approved these changes
Feb 19, 2020
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
It looks like Mergify doesn't fully support CODEOWNERS without
review-requested=0due to an open issue, which would be needed to support multiple owners. We'll want to keep owners as simple as possible for now.