fix: add preview check

[ColinBuyck]

This PR addresses #668

• Addresses the issue in full
• Addresses only certain aspects of the issue

Description

This logic update allows for partner users to see the application section of the listing detail page if they're in preview mode.

How Can This Be Tested/Reviewed?

Run locally, close a listing, make changes to that listing (ie. add a paper application), ensure those updates are reflected when you preview that closed listing.

Author Checklist:

• Added QA notes to the issue with applicable URLs
• Reviewed in a desktop view
• Reviewed in a mobile view
• Reviewed considering accessibility
• Added tests covering the changes
• Made corresponding changes to the documentation
• Ran yarn generate:client and/or created a migration when required

Review Process:

• Read and understand the issue
• Ensure the author has added QA notes
• Review the code itself from a style point of view
• Pull the changes down locally and test that the acceptance criteria is met
• Either (1) explicitly ask a clarifying question, (2) request changes, or (3) approve the PR, even if there are very small remaining changes, if you don't need to re-review after the updates

[netlify]

✅ Deploy Preview for bloom-exygy-dev ready!

Name	Link
🔨 Latest commit	a6766f5
🔍 Latest deploy log	https://app.netlify.com/sites/bloom-exygy-dev/deploys/666785ee39e1c40008141344
😎 Deploy Preview	https://deploy-preview-4126--bloom-exygy-dev.netlify.app
📱 Preview on mobile	Toggle QR Code... Use your smartphone camera to open QR code link.

---

To edit notification comments on pull requests, go to your Netlify site configuration.

[mcgarrye]

Works as expected! though personally don't love this change but whatcha gonna do. LGTM

[ColinBuyck]

Yeahhh, I feel you @mcgarrye. I'm going to double check with Product and Design before merging and pulling this over.

[ludtkemorgan]

Won't this still have the issue of if they are trying to reopen a listing that the application due date is in the past? I guess they shouldn't be publishing a listing like that, but they might want to still preview it. And even in that case an easy fix for them would to update the application due date to something in the future.

[ColinBuyck]

It will still have that behavior but my thought was that it wouldn't be an issue because it is representing what the listing would show when published. I know some admin use preview as a final "does everything look good" check and I think I'd prefer a closed application flagged to them then.