Skip to content

Add new asset process to README#7012

Open
trmartin4 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
platform/add-asset-process
Open

Add new asset process to README#7012
trmartin4 wants to merge 1 commit intomainfrom
platform/add-asset-process

Conversation

@trmartin4
Copy link
Member

@trmartin4 trmartin4 commented Feb 16, 2026

📔 Objective

Updating the process for managing email assets now that we support using git for uploading assets.

⏰ Reminders before review

  • Contributor guidelines followed
  • All formatters and local linters executed and passed
  • Written new unit and / or integration tests where applicable
  • Protected functional changes with optionality (feature flags)
  • Used internationalization (i18n) for all UI strings
  • CI builds passed
  • Communicated to DevOps any deployment requirements
  • Updated any necessary documentation (Confluence, contributing docs) or informed the documentation team

🦮 Reviewer guidelines

  • 👍 (:+1:) or similar for great changes
  • 📝 (:memo:) or ℹ️ (:information_source:) for notes or general info
  • ❓ (:question:) for questions
  • 🤔 (:thinking:) or 💭 (:thought_balloon:) for more open inquiry that's not quite a confirmed issue and could potentially benefit from discussion
  • 🎨 (:art:) for suggestions / improvements
  • ❌ (:x:) or ⚠️ (:warning:) for more significant problems or concerns needing attention
  • 🌱 (:seedling:) or ♻️ (:recycle:) for future improvements or indications of technical debt
  • ⛏ (:pick:) for minor or nitpick changes

@trmartin4 trmartin4 changed the title Added new asset dopcs to README. Adding new asset process to README Feb 16, 2026
@trmartin4 trmartin4 marked this pull request as ready for review February 16, 2026 20:02
@trmartin4 trmartin4 added the ai-review Request a Claude code review label Feb 16, 2026
@trmartin4 trmartin4 changed the title Adding new asset process to README Add new asset process to README Feb 16, 2026
@sonarqubecloud
Copy link

@trmartin4 trmartin4 requested a review from watsondm February 16, 2026 20:11
@github-actions
Copy link
Contributor

Logo
Checkmarx One – Scan Summary & Details86f36d91-ec13-4c5e-a1ea-2910811d6806

Great job! No new security vulnerabilities introduced in this pull request

@codecov
Copy link

codecov bot commented Feb 16, 2026

Codecov Report

✅ All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests.
✅ Project coverage is 56.46%. Comparing base (b03f8f8) to head (25b00c3).

Additional details and impacted files
@@           Coverage Diff           @@
##             main    #7012   +/-   ##
=======================================
  Coverage   56.46%   56.46%           
=======================================
  Files        1996     1996           
  Lines       88039    88039           
  Branches     7845     7845           
=======================================
  Hits        49715    49715           
  Misses      36487    36487           
  Partials     1837     1837           

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

ai-review Request a Claude code review

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants