deploy: d0bb7fe

lightning-specification/index.xml

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Lightning Specification on ₿itcoin Transcripts</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/</link><description>Recent content in Lightning Specification on ₿itcoin Transcripts</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1114</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-09-25-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-09-25-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1114
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>Lightning Specification on ₿itcoin Transcripts</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/</link><description>Recent content in Lightning Specification on ₿itcoin Transcripts</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1115</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-10-23-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-10-23-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1115
+Speaker 0: Alright. So, I guess the first item is something that has already been ACKed and is only one clarification. But I had one question on the PR. I was wondering, [redacted], for which feature you actually use that code because neither LND or Eclair handles — we just disconnect on anything mandatory that we haven&amp;rsquo;t set. Where are you actually using that or how are you planning on using it?</description></item><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1114</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-09-25-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-09-25-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1114
 Speaker 0: So, [redacted] pointed out that we did not do this, and we have to do this. I&amp;rsquo;ve been working on the code so that you have to push their commitment transaction. Now, there are several problems with this. One is that in many states, there are two possible commitment transactions they could have. In theory, you know what they are. In practice, it turned out to be a bit of a nightmare to unwind the state.</description></item><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1103</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-08-28-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-08-28-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1103
 Speaker 0: I don&amp;rsquo;t think I&amp;rsquo;ve seen any discussion happening on any of the PRs. So, I don&amp;rsquo;t think we should go and have them in order, except maybe the first one that we may want to just finalize and get something into the spec to say that it should be 2016 everywhere. But, as [redacted] was saying, can probably make it a one-liner and it would be easier.</description></item><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1101</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-08-14-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-08-14-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1101
 Speaker 0: Alright, should we start? I want to talk a quick update on dual funding because I&amp;rsquo;ve been working with [redacted] on cross-compatibility tests between Core Lightning and Eclair, and so far, everything looks good. The only part that has not yet been fully implemented in CLN is the reconnection part — when you disconnect in the middle of the signature exchange. This kind of reconnection is supposed to complete that signature exchange with one new TLV added to channel re-establish.</description></item><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1098</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-07-31-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-07-31-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1098

sitemap.xml

@@ -1 +1 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"><sitemap><loc>https://btctranscripts.com/en/sitemap.xml</loc><lastmod>2023-09-25T00:00:00+00:00</lastmod></sitemap><sitemap><loc>https://btctranscripts.com/es/sitemap.xml</loc><lastmod>2022-10-10T00:00:00+00:00</lastmod></sitemap><sitemap><loc>https://btctranscripts.com/pt/sitemap.xml</loc><lastmod>2020-05-09T00:00:00+00:00</lastmod></sitemap><sitemap><loc>https://btctranscripts.com/zh/sitemap.xml</loc><lastmod>2022-10-15T00:00:00+00:00</lastmod></sitemap></sitemapindex>
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><sitemapindex xmlns="http://www.sitemaps.org/schemas/sitemap/0.9"><sitemap><loc>https://btctranscripts.com/en/sitemap.xml</loc><lastmod>2023-10-23T00:00:00+00:00</lastmod></sitemap><sitemap><loc>https://btctranscripts.com/es/sitemap.xml</loc><lastmod>2022-10-10T00:00:00+00:00</lastmod></sitemap><sitemap><loc>https://btctranscripts.com/pt/sitemap.xml</loc><lastmod>2020-05-09T00:00:00+00:00</lastmod></sitemap><sitemap><loc>https://btctranscripts.com/zh/sitemap.xml</loc><lastmod>2022-10-15T00:00:00+00:00</lastmod></sitemap></sitemapindex>

tags/lightning/index.xml

@@ -1,4 +1,5 @@
-<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>lightning on ₿itcoin Transcripts</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/tags/lightning/</link><description>Recent content in lightning on ₿itcoin Transcripts</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://btctranscripts.com/tags/lightning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1114</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-09-25-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-09-25-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1114
+<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8" standalone="yes"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"><channel><title>lightning on ₿itcoin Transcripts</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/tags/lightning/</link><description>Recent content in lightning on ₿itcoin Transcripts</description><generator>Hugo -- gohugo.io</generator><language>en</language><lastBuildDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</lastBuildDate><atom:link href="https://btctranscripts.com/tags/lightning/index.xml" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1115</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-10-23-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 23 Oct 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-10-23-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1115
+Speaker 0: Alright. So, I guess the first item is something that has already been ACKed and is only one clarification. But I had one question on the PR. I was wondering, [redacted], for which feature you actually use that code because neither LND or Eclair handles — we just disconnect on anything mandatory that we haven&amp;rsquo;t set. Where are you actually using that or how are you planning on using it?</description></item><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1114</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-09-25-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-09-25-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1114
 Speaker 0: So, [redacted] pointed out that we did not do this, and we have to do this. I&amp;rsquo;ve been working on the code so that you have to push their commitment transaction. Now, there are several problems with this. One is that in many states, there are two possible commitment transactions they could have. In theory, you know what they are. In practice, it turned out to be a bit of a nightmare to unwind the state.</description></item><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1103</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-08-28-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 28 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-08-28-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1103
 Speaker 0: I don&amp;rsquo;t think I&amp;rsquo;ve seen any discussion happening on any of the PRs. So, I don&amp;rsquo;t think we should go and have them in order, except maybe the first one that we may want to just finalize and get something into the spec to say that it should be 2016 everywhere. But, as [redacted] was saying, can probably make it a one-liner and it would be easier.</description></item><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1101</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-08-14-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 14 Aug 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-08-14-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1101
 Speaker 0: Alright, should we start? I want to talk a quick update on dual funding because I&amp;rsquo;ve been working with [redacted] on cross-compatibility tests between Core Lightning and Eclair, and so far, everything looks good. The only part that has not yet been fully implemented in CLN is the reconnection part — when you disconnect in the middle of the signature exchange. This kind of reconnection is supposed to complete that signature exchange with one new TLV added to channel re-establish.</description></item><item><title>Lightning Specification Meeting - Agenda 1098</title><link>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-07-31-specification-call/</link><pubDate>Mon, 31 Jul 2023 00:00:00 +0000</pubDate><guid>https://btctranscripts.com/lightning-specification/2023-07-31-specification-call/</guid><description>Agenda: https://github.com/lightning/bolts/issues/1098