Module with its leaf dependencies in same folder

[Vakrim]

I'm working on fork with slightly modified version of fractal representation and I'm wonder if you would like to include it in destiny behind option flag. Main difference is that each file is in the same folder with dependencies.

Example

Orignal version

❯ destiny tests/fixtures/shared-with-dependencies
INFO: Generating tree for: tests/fixtures/shared-with-dependencies
shared-with-dependencies
├──index
│  ├──ParticipantSetup
│  │  ├──ParticipantSetupForm
│  │  │  ├──ConfigForm
│  │  │  │  ├──RadioBoxGroup
│  │  │  │  │  └──RadioBoxGroup.scss
│  │  │  │  ├──ConfigForm.module.scss
│  │  │  │  └──RadioBoxGroup.js
│  │  │  ├──ConfigForm.js
│  │  │  └──ParticipantSetupForm.scss
│  │  ├──ParticipantSetup.scss
│  │  └──ParticipantSetupForm.js
│  ├──shared
│  │  ├──Area
│  │  │  ├──Area.config.js
│  │  │  └──Area.module.scss
│  │  ├──CheckboxWithLabel
│  │  │  └──CheckboxWithLabel.scss
│  │  ├──Area.js
│  │  └──CheckboxWithLabel.js
│  ├──SomeOtherResource
│  │  └──SomeOtherResource.module.scss
│  ├──ParticipantSetup.js
│  └──SomeOtherResource.js
└──index.js

My version

❯ destiny --nest-main-modules tests/fixtures/shared-with-dependencies
INFO: Generating tree for: tests/fixtures/shared-with-dependencies
shared-with-dependencies
├──ParticipantSetup
│  ├──ParticipantSetupForm
│  │  ├──ConfigForm
│  │  │  ├──RadioBoxGroup
│  │  │  │  ├──RadioBoxGroup.js
│  │  │  │  └──RadioBoxGroup.scss
│  │  │  ├──ConfigForm.js
│  │  │  └──ConfigForm.module.scss
│  │  ├──ParticipantSetupForm.js
│  │  └──ParticipantSetupForm.scss
│  ├──ParticipantSetup.js
│  └──ParticipantSetup.scss
├──shared
│  ├──Area
│  │  ├──Area.js
│  │  ├──Area.config.js
│  │  └──Area.module.scss
│  └──CheckboxWithLabel
│     ├──CheckboxWithLabel.js
│     └──CheckboxWithLabel.scss
├──SomeOtherResource
│  ├──SomeOtherResource.js
│  └──SomeOtherResource.module.scss
└──index.js

It feels more natural to me that each subtree is contained in one folder and there is no need for "index" folder. But I guess it's matter of personal taste, so I'll leave it for discussion for now

[AnatoleLucet]

Hey, by what I can see, this structure looks like what @benawad proposed in #151.
Feel free to open a PR so we can look it up!