Skip to content

Conversation

@henrik
Copy link

@henrik henrik commented Feb 8, 2026

Don't have much context but from a quick look, there's no intentional "silently fail to destroy" path here.

@henrik
Copy link
Author

henrik commented Feb 8, 2026

There are a bunch more destroy where the return value is ignored. I'm guessing most should ideally be destroy!.

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant