-
Notifications
You must be signed in to change notification settings - Fork 9
New issue
Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.
By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.
Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account
[Test Case]: Track Structures Turnout Panel #41
base: develop
Are you sure you want to change the base?
[Test Case]: Track Structures Turnout Panel #41
Conversation
…ps://github.com/IFCRail/MVD-Infra-Test-Instructions into Test_Instruction_Track_Structures_Turnout_Panel
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Good start!
E2a-TRST/TSTP/Dataset/README.md
Outdated
A track turnout panel is modelled as an instance of IfcElementAssembly with Predefined Type TURNOUTPANEL. | ||
It is decomposed by elements including IfcRail.RAIL, IfcTrackElement.SLEEPER, IfcRail.CHECKRAIL, IfcTrackElement.FROG, IfcMechnicalFastner.RAILFASTNING, IfcMechnicalFastner.RAILJOINT. | ||
All the placement of these elements should be based on the placement of the turnout panel, and the turnout panel as an assembly is placed based on the alignment. | ||
It is required to define the explicit and start and end stationing of the turnout panel. |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
- typo: explicit and start?
- perhaps a mention that these should be
IfcReferent
s would be beneficial
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
Updated, thanks
E2a-TRST/TSTP/README.md
Outdated
|
||
- IfcElementAssembly | ||
- *There exists 1 IfcElementAssembly with PredefinedType set to TRACKTURNOUTPANEL* | ||
- *Each IfcElementAssembly/TRACKTURNOUTPANEL shall have a linear placement relative to the alignment* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
The sketch Turnout_Placement.png disagrees with this statement.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
This contraint is removed
E2a-TRST/TSTP/README.md
Outdated
- *There exists 1 IfcElementAssembly with PredefinedType set to TRACKTURNOUTPANEL* | ||
- *Each IfcElementAssembly/TRACKTURNOUTPANEL shall have a linear placement relative to the alignment* | ||
- *Each IfcElementAssembly/TRACKTURNOUTPANEL is spatially contained in an IfcRailwayPart/TRACKSUPERSTRUCTURE* | ||
- *Each IfcElementAssembly/TRACKTURNOUTPANEL shall have a product span placement* |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
What is product span placement? Can you point me to the documentation?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I may have missed somewhere in the readme: Regarding E2a-TRST/TSTP/Dataset/Sleeper: is it expected to have the 3D model according to the real situation or the simplified situation?
Stated in Dataset/README.md line 30:
- The geometry of IfcTrackElement.SLEEPER can be simplified and placed according to the drawing in Fig. 6.
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Choose a reason for hiding this comment
The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.
I may have missed somewhere in the readme: Regarding E2a-TRST/TSTP/Dataset/Sleeper: is it expected to have the 3D model according to the real situation or the simplified situation?
Summary
Outline of the content and tasks addressed by this pull request, don't forget to link the relevant issue(s)
Purpose
Please mark the relevant tasks that this pull request creates or updates: #28
Exchanges
Test Cases
General