feat(sort-objects): adds array-based customGroups option
#438
Conversation
This file contains bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
hugop95
force-pushed
the
feat/sort-objects/array-based-custom-groups
branch
9 times, most recently
from
d3a5a67 to
bc09686
Compare
- We will be using it for `sort-objects`.
hugop95
force-pushed
the
feat/sort-objects/array-based-custom-groups
branch
from
bc09686 to
45b3926
Compare
hugop95
force-pushed
the
feat/sort-objects/array-based-custom-groups
branch
from
45b3926 to
3e36228
Compare
azat-io
approved these changes
Jan 12, 2025
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Resolves #436
Description
Adds the grouping system of
sort-object-typestosort-objects, including the array-basedcustomGroupsoption.This is quite similar to what was done in #396.
Groups
Selectors
Ordered from most to least important.
method,member.property,member.multiline: This selector is deprecated: it allows users to keep using themultilinegroup, but themultilinemodifier should be used instead (multiline-membergroup, for example).Modifiers
multiline.Custom groups option
elementNamePattern.elementValuePatternas requested here. Disabled for functions and arrow function values.What is the purpose of this pull request?