fix: add missed IBM MQ Operation Binding

[magicmatatjahu]

I found that we have forgot to define (probably it's a bug) definition for IBM MQ Operation Binding. I know that some bindings don't need to have definition for particular kind of binding, but we should have reserved keywords.

I found it in review of #836 PR

cc @derberg @fmvilas and @dalelane you should be most interested :)

[sonarcloud]

Kudos, SonarCloud Quality Gate passed!   

0 Bugs
0 Vulnerabilities
0 Security Hotspots
0 Code Smells

No Coverage information
No Duplication information

[char0n]

@magicmatatjahu referencing also previous discussion about this in #605

[magicmatatjahu]

@char0n Hah, thanks! I didn't see your issue. However @derberg added comment #836 (comment) so I don't know what I should think about this inconsistency across bindings.

[fmvilas]

LGTM but I don't see an "Operation Binding Object" section on the ibmmq binding. We should also add it there and specify that it's just empty and reserved for future use (see example).

[derberg]

yeah, I think we should make sure ibm mq is there too, for consistency reasons

[magicmatatjahu]

@fmvilas @derberg Pr on bindings repo asyncapi/bindings#149

[fmvilas]

Awesome, thanks @magicmatatjahu. Approved it but let's wait for @rcoppen and others to review it.

[magicmatatjahu]

PR asyncapi/bindings#149 is merged. It can be merged too :)

cc @char0n

[char0n]

@fmvilas @derberg can you please look into this PR? THanks!

[char0n]

@magicmatatjahu is there any adaption required for parser-js after this PR is merged?

[magicmatatjahu]

Nope, ParserJS treats bindings atm as Map<string, any> values.

[derberg]

oh nice, asyncapi/bindings#149 is merged

lets get it in

[derberg]

@char0n as Fran wrote Approved it but let's wait for @rcoppen and others to review it., IMHO you can merge as others did review and @rcoppen is aware as he had to approve the change in the binding to get it marget, as he is a codeowner of the IBMMQ binding

[fmvilas]

Yup, feel free to merge.

[char0n]

/rtm

[asyncapi-bot]

🎉 This PR is included in version 2.5.0-next-spec.3 🎉

The release is available on GitHub release

Your semantic-release bot 📦🚀