Skip to content

Conversation

@Kv22a
Copy link

@Kv22a Kv22a commented Jan 19, 2026

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @Kv22a, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request addresses the TODO in q1.py by providing a complete implementation for the first_stable_character function. The function's purpose is to locate and return a specific type of 'stable' character within an input string, enhancing the utility of the q1.py module.

Highlights

  • q1.py function implementation: The first_stable_character function has been implemented in q1.py. This function identifies the first character that appears at least twice consecutively and does not appear again later in the string.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request implements the logic for the first_stable_character function. The core logic correctly solves the problem as described. My review provides a single, comprehensive suggestion to improve the code's readability and adherence to Python best practices by removing redundant code, cleaning up a leftover comment, and making the function's exit points more explicit.

Comment on lines +54 to 67
n = len(s)
i = 0
pass
while i < n:
char = s[i]
start = i
while i < n and s[i] == char:
i += 1
end = i

if end - start >= 2:
if char not in s[end:]:
return char # TODO: Implement your solution here
pass

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

medium

The implementation is logically correct, but it can be made cleaner and more idiomatic.

  • The pass statements on lines 56 and 67 are unnecessary and can be removed.
  • The TODO comment on line 66 should be removed now that the solution is implemented.
  • Adding an explicit return None at the end of the function makes the intent clearer than relying on an implicit return when no stable character is found.

Here is a suggested revision that incorporates these improvements.

Suggested change
n = len(s)
i = 0
pass
while i < n:
char = s[i]
start = i
while i < n and s[i] == char:
i += 1
end = i
if end - start >= 2:
if char not in s[end:]:
return char # TODO: Implement your solution here
pass
n = len(s)
i = 0
while i < n:
char = s[i]
start = i
while i < n and s[i] == char:
i += 1
end = i
if end - start >= 2:
if char not in s[end:]:
return char
return None

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant