Skip to content

Conversation

@ronakmadaann
Copy link

No description provided.

@gemini-code-assist
Copy link

Summary of Changes

Hello @ronakmadaann, I'm Gemini Code Assist1! I'm currently reviewing this pull request and will post my feedback shortly. In the meantime, here's a summary to help you and other reviewers quickly get up to speed!

This pull request introduces the initial implementation for the compressed_stack_length function within q2.py. The change provides the core logic for calculating a specific "compressed stack length" based on element comparisons, moving the file from a placeholder state to having functional code.

Highlights

  • q2.py function implementation: The compressed_stack_length function in q2.py has been implemented, replacing a placeholder pass statement.
  • Logic for calculating compressed length: The new implementation iterates through the input list, adjusting a counter based on whether the current element is identical to the previous one. It decrements the counter for consecutive identical elements and increments it for different ones, ensuring the final returned length is non-negative.

🧠 New Feature in Public Preview: You can now enable Memory to help Gemini Code Assist learn from your team's feedback. This makes future code reviews more consistent and personalized to your project's style. Click here to enable Memory in your admin console.

Using Gemini Code Assist

The full guide for Gemini Code Assist can be found on our documentation page, here are some quick tips.

Invoking Gemini

You can request assistance from Gemini at any point by creating a comment using either /gemini <command> or @gemini-code-assist <command>. Below is a summary of the supported commands on the current page.

Feature Command Description
Code Review /gemini review Performs a code review for the current pull request in its current state.
Pull Request Summary /gemini summary Provides a summary of the current pull request in its current state.
Comment @gemini-code-assist Responds in comments when explicitly tagged, both in pull request comments and review comments.
Help /gemini help Displays a list of available commands.

Customization

To customize Gemini Code Assist for GitHub experience, repository maintainers can create a configuration file and/or provide a custom code review style guide (such as PEP-8 for Python) by creating and adding files to a .gemini/ folder in the base of the repository. Detailed instructions can be found here.

Limitations & Feedback

Gemini Code Assist may make mistakes. Please leave feedback on any instances where its feedback is incorrect or counter productive. You can react with 👍 and 👎 on @gemini-code-assist comments. If you're interested in giving your feedback about your experience with Gemini Code Assist for Github and other Google products, sign up here.

You can also get AI-powered code generation, chat, as well as code reviews directly in the IDE at no cost with the Gemini Code Assist IDE Extension.

Footnotes

  1. Review the Privacy Notices, Generative AI Prohibited Use Policy, Terms of Service, and learn how to configure Gemini Code Assist in GitHub here. Gemini can make mistakes, so double check it and use code with caution.

Copy link

@gemini-code-assist gemini-code-assist bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Code Review

This pull request attempts to implement the compressed_stack_length function. However, the current implementation contains a critical logic error that leads to incorrect results for several cases. It incorrectly compares adjacent elements in the input list and mishandles the first element, instead of simulating the required stack-like cancellation behavior. I've provided a detailed comment with a corrected implementation that uses a list as a stack to accurately solve the problem.

Comment on lines +68 to +77
count = 0
for i in range(len(lst)):
if lst[i] == lst[i-1]:
count = count - 1
else:
count = count + 1
if count < 0:
return 0
else:
return count

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

critical

The current implementation has a critical logic flaw and does not correctly model the stack-like behavior described in the problem.

  1. Incorrect Comparison: The code compares lst[i] with lst[i-1], which is the previous element in the original input list. The requirement is to compare with the "most recent active number", which is the top of the conceptual stack.
  2. Edge Case i=0: When i=0, lst[i-1] accesses the last element of the list (lst[-1]), which is incorrect. The first element should always be added to the stack as there's nothing to cancel it with.

A simple counter is insufficient to solve this problem because you need to know what the last active number was. A list used as a stack is the ideal data structure for this.

Here is a corrected implementation that uses a stack to accurately track the active numbers:

    stack = []
    for num in lst:
        if stack and stack[-1] == num:
            stack.pop()
        else:
            stack.append(num)
    return len(stack)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

1 participant