Skip to content

Conversation

@bmorris3
Copy link

(in prep. in coordination with #491.)

@eteq
Copy link
Member

eteq commented Nov 3, 2025

@bmorris3 - does it make sense to combine this with #491? I know you alreday mention it above but these two are so interconnected it occurs to me maybe it makes more sense to put them together? 🤷

@AnaGabela
Copy link
Contributor

Hi,
Can you let us know what is the hourly rate you will be charging? We will need that for the paperwork.

Also can you clarify who will be the payee? Will there be a subcontractor, do you have a name?

Thanks!
A

@bmorris3
Copy link
Author

@eteq – I'm aligned with Matt's response to this question in his PR.

@AnaGabela – I'm following up with my institution, I'll let you know ASAP.

@bmorris3
Copy link
Author

bmorris3 commented Nov 18, 2025

@AnaGabela Our intention is for Space Telescope Science Institute to be the payee, and the hourly rate would be about $120 (IDC included).

@kelle
Copy link
Member

kelle commented Nov 18, 2025

Would these need to be a subaward to STScI? Like a typical grant?

@bmorris3
Copy link
Author

Would these need to be a subaward to STScI? Like a typical grant?

Waiting on confirmation from the STScI sponsored programs office (SPO).

SPO says total cost for CY2026 at:

  • 5% FTE: $13,717
  • 10% FTE: $27,433

@bmorris3 bmorris3 marked this pull request as ready for review November 20, 2025 20:24
Added total cost estimates for CY2026 based on FTE.
@eteq
Copy link
Member

eteq commented Nov 25, 2025

Please react to this comment to vote on this proposal ( 👍, 👎 or no reaction for +0)

@bmorris3 bmorris3 changed the title Broadcasting workshops across space and time Cycle 5: Broadcasting workshops across space and time Nov 25, 2025
@kelle
Copy link
Member

kelle commented Dec 8, 2025

The Cycle 5 funding request process has been hugely successful! On the downside, that means our funds are severely oversubscribed. Even after the Finance Committee and SPOC have taken into consideration community feedback/voting and alignment with the roadmap, there are still more funding requests than we can afford in 2026.

We would like to stretch the budget as far as possible, and to fund as many activities as possible, while making sure the Project remains volunteer-driven. Hence, we would like to know if this project will still meet its deliverables if your minimum budget is reduced by 25%, 50%, or 100%. Or if there’s some other minimum, feel free to specify that instead.

As a reminder, there will be more funding for 2027 and we expect the Cycle 6 call for 2027 funding requests to begin in the Fall of 2026.

Thank you for your engagement and understanding as we continue to optimize our funding and budgeting processes and the balance of volunteer vs funded work!

(@bmorris3 )

@bmorris3
Copy link
Author

bmorris3 commented Dec 9, 2025

@kelle: this program would need at least 5% FTE to deliver anything. Video recordings of the astropy workshop likely wouldn't be completed within CY26 unless funded at 10% FTE. (This project was pitched with a minimal budget to begin with.)

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

5 participants