[DRAFT] Webhook example with record completed

[frascuchon]

Description

This is a PR including an example using webhook to provide some record suggestions when annotating. This is a draft and some of the code could change.

You can start by looking at the webhook.py file

Type of change

• Bug fix (non-breaking change which fixes an issue)
• New feature (non-breaking change which adds functionality)
• Breaking change (fix or feature that would cause existing functionality to not work as expected)
• Refactor (change restructuring the codebase without changing functionality)
• Improvement (change adding some improvement to an existing functionality)
• Documentation update

How Has This Been Tested

Checklist

• I added relevant documentation
• I followed the style guidelines of this project
• I did a self-review of my code
• I made corresponding changes to the documentation
• I confirm My changes generate no new warnings
• I have added tests that prove my fix is effective or that my feature works
• I have added relevant notes to the CHANGELOG.md file (See https://keepachangelog.com/)

[burtenshaw]

@frascuchon there are excess changes.

[frascuchon]

I wi

@frascuchon there are excess changes.

I will work on several PRs ending by the webhook example

[codecov]

Codecov Report

All modified and coverable lines are covered by tests ✅

Project coverage is 91.42%. Comparing base (48a0dfe) to head (aca87e8).

Additional details and impacted files

@@                        Coverage Diff                        @@
##           feat/add-webhooks-feature-branch    #5477   +/-   ##
=================================================================
  Coverage                             91.42%   91.42%           
=================================================================
  Files                                   157      157           
  Lines                                  6321     6321           
=================================================================
  Hits                                   5779     5779           
  Misses                                  542      542           

Flag	Coverage Δ
argilla-server	91.42% <100.00%> (ø)

Flags with carried forward coverage won't be shown. Click here to find out more.

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.