Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: added errorcode and exception to http_server_requests for better slo #38892

Open
wants to merge 2 commits into
base: release
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

ApekshaBhosale
Copy link
Contributor

@ApekshaBhosale ApekshaBhosale commented Jan 29, 2025

Description

Tip

Add a TL;DR when the description is longer than 500 words or extremely technical (helps the content, marketing, and DevRel team).

Please also include relevant motivation and context. List any dependencies that are required for this change. Add links to Notion, Figma or any other documents that might be relevant to the PR.

Fixes #Issue Number
or
Fixes Issue URL

Warning

If no issue exists, please create an issue first, and check with the maintainers if the issue is valid.

Automation

/ok-to-test tags="@tag.All"

🔍 Cypress test results

Caution

🔴 🔴 🔴 Some tests have failed.
Workflow run: https://github.com/appsmithorg/appsmith/actions/runs/13072022902
Commit: cc763a7
Cypress dashboard.
Tags: @tag.All
Spec:
The following are new failures, please fix them before merging the PR:

  1. cypress/e2e/Regression/ClientSide/Git/GitSync/SwitchBranches_spec.js
List of identified flaky tests.
Fri, 31 Jan 2025 12:45:31 UTC

Communication

Should the DevRel and Marketing teams inform users about this change?

  • Yes
  • No

Summary by CodeRabbit

  • Observability Improvements
    • Enhanced error tracking and monitoring capabilities
    • Added detailed error context for server request observations
    • Improved error information logging with specific error codes and titles
    • Introduced a new constant for representing a "none" state in the application

Copy link
Contributor

coderabbitai bot commented Jan 29, 2025

Walkthrough

A new ObservationConfig configuration class has been introduced to enhance error observation capabilities in the Appsmith server. This class includes a method that customizes the server request observation mechanism by incorporating specific error handling for AppsmithException. The changes also enhance the GlobalExceptionHandler to utilize the new observation context for improved error tracking, while a new constant representing a "none" state has been added for consistency across the application.

Changes

File Change Summary
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/configurations/ObservationConfig.java Added new configuration class with customObservationConvention() method to enhance error observation.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/exceptions/GlobalExceptionHandler.java Updated to integrate with ServerRequestObservationContext for improved error context tracking.
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/constants/ce/FieldNameCE.java Added new constant NONE with value "none" for consistent representation of a "none" state.

Possibly related PRs

Suggested Labels

Bug

Suggested Reviewers

  • nidhi-nair
  • abhvsn

Poem

🔍 Observations sharp and bright,
Errors dancing in server's light,
Context rich, exceptions clear,
Tracking troubles without fear!
Code observes with wisdom's might 🚀

✨ Finishing Touches
  • 📝 Generate Docstrings (Beta)

Thank you for using CodeRabbit. We offer it for free to the OSS community and would appreciate your support in helping us grow. If you find it useful, would you consider giving us a shout-out on your favorite social media?

❤️ Share
🪧 Tips

Chat

There are 3 ways to chat with CodeRabbit:

  • Review comments: Directly reply to a review comment made by CodeRabbit. Example:
    • I pushed a fix in commit <commit_id>, please review it.
    • Generate unit testing code for this file.
    • Open a follow-up GitHub issue for this discussion.
  • Files and specific lines of code (under the "Files changed" tab): Tag @coderabbitai in a new review comment at the desired location with your query. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai generate unit testing code for this file.
    • @coderabbitai modularize this function.
  • PR comments: Tag @coderabbitai in a new PR comment to ask questions about the PR branch. For the best results, please provide a very specific query, as very limited context is provided in this mode. Examples:
    • @coderabbitai gather interesting stats about this repository and render them as a table. Additionally, render a pie chart showing the language distribution in the codebase.
    • @coderabbitai read src/utils.ts and generate unit testing code.
    • @coderabbitai read the files in the src/scheduler package and generate a class diagram using mermaid and a README in the markdown format.
    • @coderabbitai help me debug CodeRabbit configuration file.

Note: Be mindful of the bot's finite context window. It's strongly recommended to break down tasks such as reading entire modules into smaller chunks. For a focused discussion, use review comments to chat about specific files and their changes, instead of using the PR comments.

CodeRabbit Commands (Invoked using PR comments)

  • @coderabbitai pause to pause the reviews on a PR.
  • @coderabbitai resume to resume the paused reviews.
  • @coderabbitai review to trigger an incremental review. This is useful when automatic reviews are disabled for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai full review to do a full review from scratch and review all the files again.
  • @coderabbitai summary to regenerate the summary of the PR.
  • @coderabbitai generate docstrings to generate docstrings for this PR. (Beta)
  • @coderabbitai resolve resolve all the CodeRabbit review comments.
  • @coderabbitai configuration to show the current CodeRabbit configuration for the repository.
  • @coderabbitai help to get help.

Other keywords and placeholders

  • Add @coderabbitai ignore anywhere in the PR description to prevent this PR from being reviewed.
  • Add @coderabbitai summary to generate the high-level summary at a specific location in the PR description.
  • Add @coderabbitai anywhere in the PR title to generate the title automatically.

Documentation and Community

  • Visit our Documentation for detailed information on how to use CodeRabbit.
  • Join our Discord Community to get help, request features, and share feedback.
  • Follow us on X/Twitter for updates and announcements.

@github-actions github-actions bot added the skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog label Jan 29, 2025
@ApekshaBhosale ApekshaBhosale added the ok-to-test Required label for CI label Jan 29, 2025
Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (2)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/configurations/ObservationConfig.java (1)

15-34: Consider adding documentation for the custom convention.

While the implementation is solid, adding JavaDoc would help explain the purpose of this custom observation convention and its error handling capabilities.

Add documentation like:

+    /**
+     * Customizes the server request observation convention to include error details.
+     * Adds error code and exception title as low cardinality key values when an
+     * AppsmithException occurs.
+     *
+     * @return CustomServerRequestObservationConvention
+     */
     @Bean
     public ServerRequestObservationConvention customObservationConvention() {
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/exceptions/GlobalExceptionHandler.java (1)

89-93: Add error handling for observation context operations.

The context operations could potentially throw exceptions if the context is not properly initialized. Consider adding a try-catch block.

-        ServerRequestObservationContext.findCurrent(exchange.getAttributes()).ifPresent(context -> {
-            context.setError(e);
-            context.addLowCardinalityKeyValue(KeyValue.of("errorCode", e.getAppErrorCode()));
-            context.addLowCardinalityKeyValue(KeyValue.of("exception", e.getTitle()));
-        });
+        try {
+            ServerRequestObservationContext.findCurrent(exchange.getAttributes()).ifPresent(context -> {
+                context.setError(e);
+                context.addLowCardinalityKeyValue(KeyValue.of("errorCode", e.getAppErrorCode()));
+                context.addLowCardinalityKeyValue(KeyValue.of("exception", e.getTitle()));
+            });
+        } catch (Exception observationError) {
+            log.warn("Failed to set observation context for error: {}", e.getAppErrorCode(), observationError);
+        }
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 754d3ef and 54d1620.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/configurations/ObservationConfig.java (1 hunks)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/exceptions/GlobalExceptionHandler.java (2 hunks)
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (4)
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / server-build / server-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: server-unit-tests / server-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: server-spotless / spotless-check
🔇 Additional comments (2)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/configurations/ObservationConfig.java (1)

12-14: LGTM! Well-structured configuration class.

The class is properly annotated and follows Spring configuration conventions.

app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/exceptions/GlobalExceptionHandler.java (1)

13-13: LGTM! Appropriate imports added.

The new imports are correctly placed and necessary for the observation context functionality.

Also applies to: 21-21

Copy link
Contributor

@trishaanand trishaanand left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Minor comment added.

Copy link
Contributor

@coderabbitai coderabbitai bot left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Actionable comments posted: 0

🧹 Nitpick comments (1)
app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/constants/ce/FieldNameCE.java (1)

206-206: Add Javadoc to document the constant's purpose.

The constant follows the class's naming conventions. Consider adding a Javadoc comment to document its purpose in error handling contexts.

+    /** Represents a "none" state in error handling contexts. */
     public static final String NONE = "none";
📜 Review details

Configuration used: .coderabbit.yaml
Review profile: CHILL
Plan: Pro

📥 Commits

Reviewing files that changed from the base of the PR and between 54d1620 and cc763a7.

📒 Files selected for processing (2)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/configurations/ObservationConfig.java (1 hunks)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/constants/ce/FieldNameCE.java (1 hunks)
🚧 Files skipped from review as they are similar to previous changes (1)
  • app/server/appsmith-server/src/main/java/com/appsmith/server/configurations/ObservationConfig.java
⏰ Context from checks skipped due to timeout of 90000ms (5)
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / rts-build / build
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / client-build / client-build
  • GitHub Check: perform-test / server-build / server-unit-tests
  • GitHub Check: server-spotless / spotless-check
  • GitHub Check: server-unit-tests / server-unit-tests

@ApekshaBhosale ApekshaBhosale added ok-to-test Required label for CI and removed ok-to-test Required label for CI labels Jan 31, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
ok-to-test Required label for CI skip-changelog Adding this label to a PR prevents it from being listed in the changelog
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants