Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

chore: replication orioledb with syncer #1443

Open
wants to merge 33 commits into
base: main
Choose a base branch
from

Conversation

1aal
Copy link
Contributor

@1aal 1aal commented Feb 6, 2025

Removing the previous implementation based on patroni and changing it to syncer, accessing orioledb in standalone and replication mode.

@1aal 1aal changed the title chore: replication orioledb syncer chore: replication orioledb with syncer Feb 6, 2025
1aal and others added 4 commits February 6, 2025 09:56
…apecloud/kubeblocks-addons into chore/replication-orioledb-syncer
…apecloud/kubeblocks-addons into chore/replication-orioledb-syncer
@codecov-commenter
Copy link

codecov-commenter commented Feb 6, 2025

Codecov Report

Attention: Patch coverage is 0% with 27 lines in your changes missing coverage. Please review.

Project coverage is 0.00%. Comparing base (f07a6a8) to head (6210c2f).
Report is 8 commits behind head on main.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
.../orioledb/scripts-ut-spec/update_parameter_spec.sh 0.00% 27 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@          Coverage Diff          @@
##            main   #1443   +/-   ##
=====================================
  Coverage   0.00%   0.00%           
=====================================
  Files         69      70    +1     
  Lines       6900    6927   +27     
=====================================
- Misses      6900    6927   +27     

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

@1aal 1aal marked this pull request as ready for review February 8, 2025 04:48
@1aal 1aal requested review from leon-inf, Y-Rookie, a team, JashBook and ahjing99 as code owners February 8, 2025 04:48
@1aal 1aal requested a review from xuriwuyun February 8, 2025 12:05
@1aal
Copy link
Contributor Author

1aal commented Feb 8, 2025

It seems that the permission to delete configmap is missing from the policyRules setting right now, but it's covered in syncer.

When I trigger the switchover twice it reports the following error
image

@1aal 1aal requested a review from Y-Rookie February 13, 2025 08:44
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

4 participants