[SPARK-53446][CORE] Optimize BlockManager remove operations with cach… #52210
+169
−6
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
What changes were proposed in this pull request?
This PR optimizes BlockManager remove operations by introducing cached mappings to eliminate O(n) linear scans. The main changes are:
Introduced three concurrent hash maps to track block ID associations:
rddToBlockIds
: Maps RDD ID to its block IDsbroadcastToBlockIds
: Maps broadcast ID to its block IDssessionToBlockIds
: Maps session UUID to its cache block IDsAdded cache maintenance methods:
addToCache(blockId)
: Updates caches when blocks are storedremoveFromCache(blockId)
: Updates caches when blocks are deletedReworked remove operations to use cached lookups:
removeRdd()
,removeBroadcast()
, andremoveCache()
now perform O(1) lookups instead of scanning all entriesIntegrated with block lifecycle:
doPutIterator()
callsaddToCache()
after successful block storageremoveBlock()
callsremoveFromCache()
when blocks are removedWhy are the changes needed?
Previously,
removeRdd()
,removeBroadcast()
, andremoveCache()
required scanning all blocks inblockInfoManager.entries
to find matches. This approach becomes a serious bottleneck when:The original
removeRdd()
method already contained a TODO noting that an additional mapping would be needed to avoid linear scans. This PR implements that improvement.Does this PR introduce any user-facing change?
No.
How was this patch tested?
removeRdd()
,removeBroadcast()
, andremoveCache()
, including edge cases.Before optimization

After optimization
The optimization delivers significant performance improvements for block cleanup under large data volumes, reducing the overhead caused by frequent GC when blocks accumulate.
Was this patch authored or co-authored using generative AI tooling?
No.