Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

RANGER-5061: security-admin module(common package): update for code readability improvementRanger 5061 common #487

Merged
merged 3 commits into from
Jan 6, 2025

Conversation

vyommani
Copy link

@vyommani vyommani commented Jan 3, 2025

What changes were proposed in this pull request?

Fixes all checkstyle related errors in common package for security-admin module

How was this patch tested?

mvn clean install

@pradeepagrawal8184 pradeepagrawal8184 force-pushed the RANGER-5061_master branch 2 times, most recently from a27465e to 8a3d7e9 Compare January 3, 2025 19:52
@@ -42,22 +37,22 @@

import javax.persistence.OptimisticLockException;

import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.List;

@Component
public class RangerTransactionSynchronizationAdapter extends TransactionSynchronizationAdapter {

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

According to checkstyle rules, the build should fail on blank line following an open curly brace. Is it not happening?

Copy link
Author

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

No it is not failing for me, i checked again may be for class declaration it is optional.

Copy link
Contributor

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@kumaab - fail on checkstyle violation is not enabled in security-admin/pom.xml.

@mneethiraj mneethiraj merged commit 07d2bba into apache:RANGER-5061_master Jan 6, 2025
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants