Skip to content
New issue

Have a question about this project? Sign up for a free GitHub account to open an issue and contact its maintainers and the community.

By clicking “Sign up for GitHub”, you agree to our terms of service and privacy statement. We’ll occasionally send you account related emails.

Already on GitHub? Sign in to your account

Pipe IT: Add table model related IT #14086

Merged
merged 40 commits into from
Nov 14, 2024

Conversation

luoluoyuyu
Copy link
Contributor

Description

As the title said


This PR has:

  • been self-reviewed.
    • concurrent read
    • concurrent write
    • concurrent read and write
  • added documentation for new or modified features or behaviors.
  • added Javadocs for most classes and all non-trivial methods.
  • added or updated version, license, or notice information
  • added comments explaining the "why" and the intent of the code wherever would not be obvious
    for an unfamiliar reader.
  • added unit tests or modified existing tests to cover new code paths, ensuring the threshold
    for code coverage.
  • added integration tests.
  • been tested in a test IoTDB cluster.

Key changed/added classes (or packages if there are too many classes) in this PR

@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu self-assigned this Nov 14, 2024
@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu changed the title Pipe: Integration test of the Pipe support table model Pipe IT: Integration test of the Pipe support table model Nov 14, 2024
@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu changed the title Pipe IT: Integration test of the Pipe support table model Pipe IT: Add table model related IT Nov 14, 2024
Copy link
Member

@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Wonderful!

@SteveYurongSu SteveYurongSu merged commit 86a3377 into apache:master Nov 14, 2024
29 of 30 checks passed
Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment
Labels
None yet
Projects
None yet
Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants